Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26312652›Full record

ArticleAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration2015

Eye-tracking in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A longitudinal study of saccadic and cognitive tasks.

Malcolm Proudfoot, Ricarda A L Menke, Rakesh Sharma, Claire M Berna, Stephen L Hicks, Christopher Kennard, Kevin Talbot, Martin R Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Atypical features including acquired oculomotor apraxia inJournal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Primary Lateral Sclerosis: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Malcolm Proudfoota Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Ricarda A L Menkea Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Rakesh Sharmaa Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Claire M Bernaa Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Stephen L Hicksa Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Christopher Kennarda Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Kevin Talbota Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Martin R Turnera Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701923Medical Research Council MR/K01014X/1Motor Neurone Disease Association TURNER/JAN13/944-795Wellcome Trust 104369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A relative preservation of eye movements is notable in ALS, but saccadic functions have not been studied longitudinally. ALS overlaps with FTD, typically involving executive dysfunction, and eye-tracking offers additional potential for the assessment of extramotor pathology where writing and speaking are both impaired. Eye-tracking measures (including anti-saccade, trail-making and visual search tasks) were assessed at six-monthly intervals for up to two years in a group of ALS (n = 61) and primary lateral sclerosis (n = 7) patients, compared to healthy age-matched controls (n = 39) assessed on a single occasion. Task performance was explored speculatively in relation to resting-state functional MRI (R-FMRI) network connectivity. Results showed that ALS patients were impaired on executive and visual search tasks despite normal basic saccadic function, and impairments in the PLS patients were unexpectedly often more severe. No significant progression was detected longitudinally in either group. No changes in R-FMRI network connectivity were identified in relation to patient performance. In conclusion, eye-tracking offers an objective means to assess extramotor cerebral involvement in ALS. The relative resistance of pure oculomotor function is confirmed, and higher-level executive impairments do not follow the same rate of decline as physical disability. PLS patients may have more cortical dysfunction than has been previously appreciated.

Indexed as

CognitionSaccadesAdultAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCognition DisordersEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOculomotor Nerve DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityanti-saccadecognitiveeye-trackingmagnetic resonance imagingMotor neuron diseasesaccadetrail making

Identifiers

PMID26312652
PMCPMC5127416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.