ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2015
Comparison of the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of chair-based exercise on physical functioning in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Chair-Based Exercise on Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Online training program maintains motor functions and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Immediate effects of the trunk stabilizing exercise on static balance parameters in double-leg and one-leg stances.Journal of physical therapy science · 2016Article
- Effects of inpatient physical therapy on the functional status of elderly individuals.Journal of physical therapy science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly. [Subjects and Methods] The study included 30 elderly women from D city. The subjects were divided into the following two groups, according to the training position: the sitting group (n = 15) and standing group (n = 15). Both groups performed training for 20 min, thrice a week for 8 weeks. The short form of the berg balance scale (SFBBS), timed 10-m walk test (10MWT), timed up & go test (TUG), and falls efficacy scale (FES) were used before and after training. [Results] SFBBS, 10MWT, and TUG values were significantly different between before and after training in both groups. However, FES values were significantly different in only the standing group. [Conclusion] Balance training in a standing position is helpful for improving activities that mainly use the lower extremities, such as gait, and training in a sitting position is somewhat helpful for improving balance ability. In addition, balance training in both positions can help overcome the fear of falling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.