Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311899›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2015

Machine Learning-based Classification of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients by Their Protein Expression Profiles.

Sally J Deeb, Stefka Tyanova, Michael Hummel, Marc Schmidt-Supprian, Juergen Cox, Matthias Mann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Computational modelling of aggressive B-cell lymphoma.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Phosphoproteomics and Organelle Proteomics in Pancreatic Islets.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sally J DeebFrom the ‡Proteomics and Signal Transduction Group and.
Stefka TyanovaFrom the ‡Proteomics and Signal Transduction Group and §Computational Systems Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Michael Hummel¶Institute of Pathology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Molecular Diagnostics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany, and.
Marc Schmidt-Supprian‖Institute of Oncology and Hematology, III. Medizinische Klinik, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Juergen Cox§Computational Systems Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Matthias MannFrom the ‡Proteomics and Signal Transduction Group and mmann@biochem.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterization of tumors at the molecular level has improved our knowledge of cancer causation and progression. Proteomic analysis of their signaling pathways promises to enhance our understanding of cancer aberrations at the functional level, but this requires accurate and robust tools. Here, we develop a state of the art quantitative mass spectrometric pipeline to characterize formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of patients with closely related subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We combined a super-SILAC approach with label-free quantification (hybrid LFQ) to address situations where the protein is absent in the super-SILAC standard but present in the patient samples. Shotgun proteomic analysis on a quadrupole Orbitrap quantified almost 9,000 tumor proteins in 20 patients. The quantitative accuracy of our approach allowed the segregation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients according to their cell of origin using both their global protein expression patterns and the 55-protein signature obtained previously from patient-derived cell lines (Deeb, S. J., D'Souza, R. C., Cox, J., Schmidt-Supprian, M., and Mann, M. (2012) Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 77-89). Expression levels of individual segregation-driving proteins as well as categories such as extracellular matrix proteins behaved consistently with known trends between the subtypes. We used machine learning (support vector machines) to extract candidate proteins with the highest segregating power. A panel of four proteins (PALD1, MME, TNFAIP8, and TBC1D4) is predicted to classify patients with low error rates. Highly ranked proteins from the support vector analysis revealed differential expression of core signaling molecules between the subtypes, elucidating aspects of their pathobiology.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMachine LearningApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorFormaldehydeGTPase-Activating ProteinsHumansIsotope LabelingLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseNeoplasm ProteinsNeprilysinPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPrincipal Component AnalysisProteomeProteomicsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorFormaldehydeGTPase-Activating ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNeprilysinPALD1 protein, humanPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProteomeTBC1D4 protein, humanTNFAIP8 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26311899
PMCPMC4638038
OpenAlexW1851565937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.