ArticleNeurology2015
Predicting frequent ED use by people with epilepsy with health information exchange data.
Article in Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heavy metal biomarkers and their impact on hearing loss risk: a machine learning framework analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Characterizing emergency department and inpatient health care utilization after seizure-related hospitalization: A retrospective cohort study.Epilepsia · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models in Health Information Exchange: A Systematic Review of Clinical Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Disparities in adherence and emergency department utilization among people with epilepsy: A machine learning approach.Seizure · 2023Article
- Machine learning to improve frequent emergency department use prediction: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Decreasing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Epilepsy.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Automated Identification of Surgical Candidates and Estimation of Postoperative Seizure Freedom in Children - A Focused Review.Seminars in pediatric neurology · 2021Review
- Early identification of epilepsy surgery candidates: A multicenter, machine learning study.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
- Article
- The impact of a depression self-management intervention on seizure activity.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2020Article
- Persistent frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: A population-based cohort study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Expanding Health Information Exchange Improves Identification of Frequent Emergency Department Users.Annals of emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Reduction of emergency department visits using an urgent clinic for children with established epilepsy.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2016Article
- Predicting Emergency Department Visits.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016Article
- Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe (1) the predictability of frequent emergency department (ED) use (a marker of inadequate disease control and/or poor access to care), and (2) the demographics, comorbidities, and use of health services of frequent ED users, among people with epilepsy.
methodsWe obtained demographics, comorbidities, and 2 years of encounter data for 8,041 people with epilepsy from a health information exchange in New York City. Using a retrospective cohort design, we explored bivariate relationships between baseline characteristics (year 1) and subsequent frequent ED use (year 2). We then built, evaluated, and compared predictive models to identify frequent ED users (≥4 visits year 2), using multiple techniques (logistic regression, lasso, elastic net, CART [classification and regression trees], Random Forests, AdaBoost, support vector machines). We selected a final model based on performance and simplicity.
resultsPeople with epilepsy who, in year 1, were adults (rather than children or seniors), male, Manhattan residents, frequent users of health services, users of multiple health systems, or had medical, neurologic, or psychiatric comorbidities, were more likely to frequently use the ED in year 2. Predictive techniques identified frequent ED visitors with good positive predictive value (approximately 70%) but poor sensitivity (approximately 20%). A simple strategy, selecting individuals with 11+ ED visits in year 1, performed as well as more sophisticated models.
conclusionsPeople with epilepsy with 11+ ED visits in a year are at highest risk of continued frequent ED use and may benefit from targeted intervention to avoid preventable ED visits. Future work should focus on improving the sensitivity of predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.