Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311710›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2015

Orchid conservation: making the links.

Michael F Fay, Thierry Pailler, Kingsley W Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Diversity of unique, nonmycorrhizal endophytic fungi in cultivatedPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Orchid conservation: further links.Annals of botany · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael F FayRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK, m.fay@kew.org.
Thierry PaillerPeuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical, CIRAD-Université de La Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin BP 7151, 97715 Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France and.
Kingsley W DixonDepartment of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orchidaceae, one of the largest families of flowering plants, present particular challenges for conservation, due in great part to their often complex interactions with mycorrhizal fungi, pollinators and host trees. In this Highlight, we present seven papers focusing on orchids and their interactions and other factors relating to their conservation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesOrchidaceaeConservation biologyepiphytesfungimycorrhizasOrchidaceaeorchidspollination ecology

Identifiers

PMID26311710
PMCPMC4549965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.