Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311705›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2015

Collaboration and communication in colorectal cancer care: a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by patients and health care professionals.

Martina Kamradt, Ines Baudendistel, Gerda Längst, Marion Kiel, Felicitas Eckrich, Eva Winkler, Joachim Szecsenyi, Dominik Ose

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The needs of colorectal cancer patients/survivors: A narrative review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martina KamradtDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and martina.kamradt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Ines BaudendistelDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and.
Gerda LängstDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and.
Marion KielDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and.
Felicitas EckrichEthics and Patient-Oriented Care, National Centre for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva WinklerEthics and Patient-Oriented Care, National Centre for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and.
Dominik OseDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is becoming a chronic condition. This has significant implications for the delivery of health care and implies the involvement of a range of health care professionals (HCPs) from different settings to ensure the needed quality and continuity of care.

objectivesTo explore the challenges that patients and HCPs experience in the course of colorectal cancer care and the perceived consequences caused by these challenges.

methodsTen semi-structured focus groups were conducted including patients receiving treatment for colorectal cancer, representatives of patient support groups, physicians and other non-physician HCPs from different health care settings. Participants were asked to share their experiences regarding colorectal cancer care. All data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsPatients and HCPs (total N = 47) experienced collaboration and communication as well as exchange of information between HCPs as challenging. Particularly communication and information exchange with GPs appeared to be lacking. The difficulties identified restricted a well-working coordination of care and seemed to cause inappropriate health care.

conclusionColorectal cancer care seems to require an effective, well-working collaboration and communication between the different HCPs involved ensuring the best possible care to suit patients' individual needs. However, the perceived challenges and consequences of our participants seem to restrict the delivery of the needed quality of care. Therefore, it seems crucial (i) to include all HCPs involved, especially the GP, (ii) to support an efficient and standardized exchange of health-related information and (iii) to focus on the patients' entire pathway of care.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSelf-Help GroupsCollaborationcolorectal cancercommunicationgeneral practitionerqualitative methodsquality of health care.

Identifiers

PMID26311705
PMCPMC4652682
OpenAlexW1935527406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.