ArticleFamily practice2015
Collaboration and communication in colorectal cancer care: a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by patients and health care professionals.
Article in Family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- "I had to work it out for myself": opportunities for primary care to fill a void for early-onset breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- From Hospital to Home: Patient Experiences With Medication Counselling for Colorectal Cancer.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Exploring the lack of continuity of care in older cancer patients under China's 'integrated health system' reform.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Patients' experiences of living with a stoma in rural areas in Northern Sweden.International journal of circumpolar health · 2023Article
- The needs of colorectal cancer patients/survivors: A narrative review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
- The Intersectoral Care of Cancer Patients: Weaknesses and Strategies for Improvement.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Article
- Caregivers' role in using a personal electronic health record: a qualitative study of cancer patients and caregivers in Germany.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Challenges to cross-sectoral care experienced by professionals working with patients living with low back pain: a qualitative interview study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Views of psycho-oncologists, physicians, and nurses on cancer care-A qualitative study.PloS one · 2019Article
- Correspondence between primary and secondary care about patients with cancer: A qualitative mixed-methods analysis.European journal of cancer care · 2019Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of follow-up for prostate cancer in primary care: a pilot study.BJGP open · 2018Article
- Utilizing a Prototype Patient-Controlled Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of User-Reported Perceptions and Perspectives.JMIR formative research · 2018Article
- A Personal Electronic Health Record: Study Protocol of a Feasibility Study on Implementation in a Real-World Health Care Setting.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Complexity of care and strategies of self-management in patients with colorectal cancer.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
- Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research: Results of Qualitative Interviews With Focus Group Moderators.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is becoming a chronic condition. This has significant implications for the delivery of health care and implies the involvement of a range of health care professionals (HCPs) from different settings to ensure the needed quality and continuity of care.
objectivesTo explore the challenges that patients and HCPs experience in the course of colorectal cancer care and the perceived consequences caused by these challenges.
methodsTen semi-structured focus groups were conducted including patients receiving treatment for colorectal cancer, representatives of patient support groups, physicians and other non-physician HCPs from different health care settings. Participants were asked to share their experiences regarding colorectal cancer care. All data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsPatients and HCPs (total N = 47) experienced collaboration and communication as well as exchange of information between HCPs as challenging. Particularly communication and information exchange with GPs appeared to be lacking. The difficulties identified restricted a well-working coordination of care and seemed to cause inappropriate health care.
conclusionColorectal cancer care seems to require an effective, well-working collaboration and communication between the different HCPs involved ensuring the best possible care to suit patients' individual needs. However, the perceived challenges and consequences of our participants seem to restrict the delivery of the needed quality of care. Therefore, it seems crucial (i) to include all HCPs involved, especially the GP, (ii) to support an efficient and standardized exchange of health-related information and (iii) to focus on the patients' entire pathway of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.