Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2016
Medicine preparation errors in ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence, Causes and Severity of Medication Administration Errors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drug safety · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic evidence review of rates and burden of harm of intravenous admixture drug preparation errors in healthcare settings.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Inhomogeneity of noradrenaline levels in syringe pump systems and how to prevent it: an in vitro study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Healthcare-associated bloodstream infections caused by bacterial and fungal contamination of intravenous fluids and medicines in healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Stability study of common vasoactive drugs diluted in five types of solutions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Parenteral morphine and oxycodone mixtures administered in specialised palliative and hospice care units: A retrospective medical record review.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Implementation of a national system for best practice delivery of paediatric infusions.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Prevalence and determinants of intravenous admixture preparation errors: A prospective observational study in a university hospital.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Observational
- Analysis of standard concentrations of continuous infusions in nine Spanish neonatal intensive care units.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022Observational
- Intravenous drug use in neonatal intensive care units.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Observational
- Incident reports versus direct observation to identify medication errors and risk factors in hospitalised newborns.European journal of pediatrics · 2019Observational
- Intravenous medicine preparation technique training programme for nurses in clinical areas.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018Review
- Neonates and medicines: a roadmap to further improve neonatal pharmaceutical care.European journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the rate of errors in intravenous medicine preparation at the bedside in neonatal intensive care units vs the preparation error rate in a hospital pharmacy service. We conducted a prospective observational study between June and September 2013. Ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units and one hospital pharmacy service participated in the study. Two types of preparation errors were considered: calculation errors and accuracy errors. A total of 522 samples were collected: 238 of vancomycin, 139 of gentamicin, 39 of phenobarbital and 88 of caffeine citrate preparations. Of these, 444 samples were collected by nurses in neonatal intensive care units, and 60 were provided by the hospital pharmacy service. Overall, 18 samples were excluded from the analysis. We detected calculation errors in 6/444 (1.35%) and accuracy errors in 243/444 (54.7%) samples from the neonatal intensive care units. In contrast, in samples from the hospital pharmacy service, no calculation errors were detected, but there were accuracy errors in 23/60 (38.3%) samples.
conclusionWhile calculation errors can be eliminated using protocols based on standard drug concentrations, accuracy error rates depend on several variables that affect both neonatal intensive care units and hospital pharmacy services. WHAT IS KNOWN: Medication use is associated with a risk of errors and adverse events. Medication errors are more frequent and have more severe consequences in paediatric patients. Lack of knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in relation to physiological immaturity makes neonates more vulnerable to medication errors. WHAT IS NEW: Calculation errors are avoided using concentration standard preparation protocols. Accuracy in the preparation process depends mainly on the degree to which commercial drug preparations meet current legal requirements and the syringes and preparation techniques used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26311566What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.