ArticlePharmaceutical research2016
Thermodynamic Proxies to Compensate for Biases in Drug Discovery Methods.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural and Thermodynamic Basis of the Enhanced Interaction between Kinesin Spindle Protein Eg5 and STLC-type Inhibitors.ACS omega · 2018Article
- Data Mining and Computational Modeling of High-Throughput Screening Datasets.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018Article
- The Next Era: Deep Learning in Pharmaceutical Research.Pharmaceutical research · 2016Review
- "Zipped Synthesis" by Cross-Metathesis Provides a Cystathionine β-Synthase Inhibitor that Attenuates Cellular H2S Levels and Reduces Neuronal Infarction in a Rat Ischemic Stroke Model.ACS central science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe propose a framework with simple proxies to dissect the relative energy contributions responsible for standard drug discovery binding activity.
methodsWe explore a rule of thumb using hydrogen-bond donors, hydrogen-bond acceptors and rotatable bonds as relative proxies for the thermodynamic terms. We apply this methodology to several datasets (e.g., multiple small molecules profiled against kinases, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) high throughput screening (HTS) and structure based drug design (SBDD) derived compounds, and FDA approved drugs).
resultsWe found that Mtb active compounds developed through SBDD methods had statistically significantly larger PEnthalpy values than HTS derived compounds, suggesting these compounds had relatively more hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptors compared to rotatable bonds. In recent FDA approved medicines we found that compounds identified via target-based approaches had a more balanced enthalpic relationship between these descriptors compared to compounds identified via phenotypic screens
conclusionsAs it is common to experimentally optimize directly for total binding energy, these computational methods provide alternative calculations and approaches useful for compound optimization alongside other common metrics in available software and databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.