ArticleGenetics2015
A Coalescent Model for a Sweep of a Unique Standing Variant.
Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Evaluating ARG-estimation methods in the context of estimating population-mean polygenic score histories.Genetics · 2025Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing Reveals Substantial Genetic Structure and Evidence of Local Adaptation in Alaskan Red King Crab.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Evaluating ARG-estimation methods in the context of estimating population-mean polygenic score histories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Tree Sequences as a General-Purpose Tool for Population Genetic Inference.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Tree sequences as a general-purpose tool for population genetic inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Across two continents: The genomic basis of environmental adaptation in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from the Americas.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Across two continents: the genomic basis of environmental adaptation in house mice (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?Genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Selective Sweeps Under Dominance and Inbreeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- The effect of autopolyploidy on population genetic signals of hard sweeps.Biology letters · 2020Article
- Article
- Population genomics perspectives on convergent adaptation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of genetic polymorphism data to understand the dynamics of adaptation and identify the loci that are involved has become a major pursuit of modern evolutionary genetics. In addition to the classical "hard sweep" hitchhiking model, recent research has drawn attention to the fact that the dynamics of adaptation can play out in a variety of different ways and that the specific signatures left behind in population genetic data may depend somewhat strongly on these dynamics. One particular model for which a large number of empirical examples are already known is that in which a single derived mutation arises and drifts to some low frequency before an environmental change causes the allele to become beneficial and sweeps to fixation. Here, we pursue an analytical investigation of this model, bolstered and extended via simulation study. We use coalescent theory to develop an analytical approximation for the effect of a sweep from standing variation on the genealogy at the locus of the selected allele and sites tightly linked to it. We show that the distribution of haplotypes that the selected allele is present on at the time of the environmental change can be approximated by considering recombinant haplotypes as alleles in the infinite-alleles model. We show that this approximation can be leveraged to make accurate predictions regarding patterns of genetic polymorphism following such a sweep. We then use simulations to highlight which sources of haplotypic information are likely to be most useful in distinguishing this model from neutrality, as well as from other sweep models, such as the classic hard sweep and multiple-mutation soft sweeps. We find that in general, adaptation from a unique standing variant will likely be difficult to detect on the basis of genetic polymorphism data from a single population time point alone, and when it can be detected, it will be difficult to distinguish from other varieties of selective sweeps. Samples from multiple populations and/or time points have the potential to ease this difficulty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.