ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015
A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05765539 (Performance of the Echopen Probe in Its Clinical Use for Pregnancy Follow-up in Senegal), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Performance of the Echopen Probe in Its Clinical Use for Pregnancy Follow-up in Senegal
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- "A Picture Paints a Thousand Words"-A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Pooled it
- Shaping ultrasound in midwifery: towards an evidence-based training framework for enhanced prenatal care.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Article
- Maternal health care professionals' experiences and views on the use of obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- A qualitative study of the work experiences of midwives performing obstetric ultrasound in Norway.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Vietnam: a regional, cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- A much valued tool that also brings ethical dilemmas - a qualitative study of Norwegian midwives' experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2018Article
- Feasibility of Using a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device to Measure the Inferior Vena Cava Diameter of Patients With Heart Failure in the Community Setting: A Pilot Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- 'Essential but not always available when needed' - an interview study of physicians' experiences and views regarding use of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania.Global health actionArticle
- Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound is a tool of increasing importance in maternity care. Midwives have a central position in the care of pregnant women. However, studies regarding their experiences of the use of ultrasound in this context are limited. The purpose of this study was to explore Australian midwives' experiences and views of the role of obstetric ultrasound particularly in relation to clinical management of complicated pregnancy, and situations where maternal and fetal health interests conflict.
methodsA qualitative study was undertaken in Victoria, Australia in 2012, based on six focus group discussions with midwives (n = 37) working in antenatal and intrapartum care, as part of the CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS). Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsOne overarching theme emerged from the analysis: Obstetric ultrasound--a routine tool with far-reaching influence, and it was built on three categories. First, the category'Experiencing pros and cons of ultrasound' highlighted that ultrasound was seen as having many advantages; however, it was also seen as contributing to increased medicalisation of pregnancy, to complex and sometimes uncertain decision-making and to parental anxiety. Second, 'Viewing ultrasound as a normalised and unquestioned examination' illuminated how the use of ultrasound has become normalised and unquestioned in health care and in wider society. Midwives were concerned that this impacts negatively on informed consent processes, and at a societal level, to threaten acceptance of human variation and disability. Third, 'Reflecting on the fetus as a person in relation to the pregnant woman' described views on that ultrasound has led to increased 'personification' of the fetus, and that women often put fetal health interests ahead of their own.
conclusionsThe results reflect the significant influence ultrasound has had in maternity care and highlights ethical and professional challenges that midwives face in their daily working lives concerning its use. Further discussion about the use of ultrasound is needed, both among health professionals and in the community, in order to protect women's rights to informed decision-making and autonomy in pregnancy and childbirth and to curb unnecessary medicalisation of pregnancy. Midwives' experiences and views play an essential role in such discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.