Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311309›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2015

Weak conservation of structural features in the interfaces of homologous transient protein-protein complexes.

Govindarajan Sudha, Prashant Singh, Lakshmipuram S Swapna, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Govindarajan SudhaMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India.
Prashant SinghMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India.
Lakshmipuram S SwapnaMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India.
Narayanaswamy SrinivasanMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residue types at the interface of protein-protein complexes (PPCs) are known to be reasonably well conserved. However, we show, using a dataset of known 3-D structures of homologous transient PPCs, that the 3-D location of interfacial residues and their interaction patterns are only moderately and poorly conserved, respectively. Another surprising observation is that a residue at the interface that is conserved is not necessarily in the interface in the homolog. Such differences in homologous complexes are manifested by substitution of the residues that are spatially proximal to the conserved residue and structural differences at the interfaces as well as differences in spatial orientations of the interacting proteins. Conservation of interface location and the interaction pattern at the core of the interfaces is higher than at the periphery of the interface patch. Extents of variability of various structural features reported here for homologous transient PPCs are higher than the variation in homologous permanent homomers. Our findings suggest that straightforward extrapolation of interfacial nature and inter-residue interaction patterns from template to target could lead to serious errors in the modeled complex structure. Understanding the evolution of interfaces provides insights to improve comparative modeling of PPC structures.

Indexed as

Binding SitesProtein BindingModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesProtein ConformationStructural Homology, ProteinSurface PropertiesMultiprotein Complexesevolution of protein complexesinterfaces of protein complexesprotein-protein interactionsstructure of protein complexestransient protein complexes

Identifiers

PMID26311309
PMCPMC4622218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.