Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311176›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

An Exploration into Fern Genome Space.

Paul G Wolf, Emily B Sessa, Daniel Blaine Marchant, Fay-Wei Li, Carl J Rothfels, Erin M Sigel, Matthew A Gitzendanner, Clayton J Visger, Jo Ann Banks, Douglas E Soltis and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
33.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transcriptional analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mobile Elements Shape Plastome Evolution in Ferns.Genome biology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Paul G WolfEcology Center and Department of Biology, Utah State University paul.wolf@usu.edu.
Emily B SessaDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Genetics Institute, University of Florida.
Daniel Blaine MarchantDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Genetics Institute, University of Florida Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida.
Fay-Wei LiDepartment of Biology, Duke University.
Carl J RothfelsUniversity Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley.
Erin M SigelDepartment of Biology, Duke University Present address: Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia.
Matthew A GitzendannerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Genetics Institute, University of Florida Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida.
Clayton J VisgerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Genetics Institute, University of Florida Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida.
Jo Ann BanksDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University.
Douglas E SoltisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Genetics Institute, University of Florida Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida.
Pamela S SoltisGenetics Institute, University of Florida Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida.
Kathleen M PryerDepartment of Biology, Duke University.
Joshua P DerDepartment of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton.
University of Florida · USDuke University · USCalifornia State University, Fullerton · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ferns are one of the few remaining major clades of land plants for which a complete genome sequence is lacking. Knowledge of genome space in ferns will enable broad-scale comparative analyses of land plant genes and genomes, provide insights into genome evolution across green plants, and shed light on genetic and genomic features that characterize ferns, such as their high chromosome numbers and large genome sizes. As part of an initial exploration into fern genome space, we used a whole genome shotgun sequencing approach to obtain low-density coverage (∼0.4X to 2X) for six fern species from the Polypodiales (Ceratopteris, Pteridium, Polypodium, Cystopteris), Cyatheales (Plagiogyria), and Gleicheniales (Dipteris). We explore these data to characterize the proportion of the nuclear genome represented by repetitive sequences (including DNA transposons, retrotransposons, ribosomal DNA, and simple repeats) and protein-coding genes, and to extract chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences. Such initial sweeps of fern genomes can provide information useful for selecting a promising candidate fern species for whole genome sequencing. We also describe variation of genomic traits across our sample and highlight some differences and similarities in repeat structure between ferns and seed plants.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantDNA, PlantFernsGenome, ChloroplastGenome, MitochondrialGenome SizeGenomicsPlant ProteinsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA, PlantPlant Proteinschloroplastcomparative genomicsmitochondriaplastomerepeat contenttransposons

Identifiers

PMID26311176
PMCPMC4607520
OpenAlexW2184617961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.