Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311127›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2016

Structure of Manila Clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) Microbiota at the Organ Scale in Contrasting Sets of Individuals.

Guillaume Meisterhans, Natalie Raymond, Emilie Girault, Christophe Lambert, Line Bourrasseau, Xavier de Montaudouin, Frédéric Garabetian, Florence Jude-Lemeilleur

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbiota characterization of the green musselFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metataxonomic analysis of tissue-associated microbiota in grooved carpet-shell (Ruditapes decussatus) and Manila (Ruditapes philippinarum) clams.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbiome of the Black-Lipped Pearl OysterFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillaume MeisterhansUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France. guillaume.meisterhans@hotmail.fr.
Natalie RaymondUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France.
Emilie GiraultUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France.
Christophe LambertLEMAR UMR 6539, Unité Mixte UBO/CNRS/IFREMER/IRD, IUEM, Place Nicolas Copernic, F-29280, Plouzané, France.
Line BourrasseauUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France.
Xavier de MontaudouinUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France.
Frédéric GarabetianUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France.
Florence Jude-LemeilleurUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5805 EPOC, F-33120, Arcachon, France.
Université de Bordeaux · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux · FRInstitut Universitaire Européen de la Mer · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine invertebrate microbiota has a key function in host physiology and health. To date, knowledge about bivalve microbiota is poorly documented except public health concerns. This study used a molecular approach to characterize the microbiota associated with the bivalve Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) by determining (1) the difference among organs either or not under the influence of host habitat, (2) small-scale variability of microbiota, and (3) the experimental response of the Manila clam microbiota submitted to different lateral transmissions. These questions were investigated by sampling two groups of individuals living in contrasting habitats and carrying out a transplant experiment. Manila clam microbiota (i.e., bacterial community structure) was determined at organ-scale (gills, gut, and a pool of remaining tissues) by capillary electrophoresis DNA fingerprinting (CE fingerprinting). The Manila clam microbiota structure differed among organs indicating a selection of Manila clam microbiota at organ scale. Habitat strongly influenced gill and gut microbiota. In contrast, microbiota associated with remaining tissues was similar between group individuals suggesting that these communities are mostly autochthonous, i.e., Manila clam specific. Transplant experiment showed that improving living condition did not induce any change in microbiota associated with remaining tissues. In contrast, the reduction in individual habitat quality led to individuals in declining health as strongly suggested by the increase in phagocytosis activity and decrease in condition index together with the change in internal organ microbiota. This study provides a first description of the Manila clam holobiont which can withstand disturbance and respond opportunistically to improved environmental conditions.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAnimal StructuresBacteriaBivalviaShellfishBivalve microbial communitiesClam associated bacteriaTransplant experiment

Identifiers

PMID26311127
OpenAlexW1928100692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.