Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26311100›Full record

Trial reportOrthopaedic surgery2015

Intra-articular Adjuvant Analgesics following Knee Arthroscopy: Comparison between Single and Double Dose Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine A Multicenter Prospective Double-blind Trial.

Ranajit Panigrahi, Ritesh Roy, Amita Kumari Mahapatra, Anju Prasad, Ashok Priyadarshi, Nishit Palo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orthopaedic surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05807945 (Comparison of the Effect of Intra-articular Administration of 0.2% Ropivacaine vs. 0.75% Ropivacaine as an Analgesic in the Immediate Postoperative Period of Knee Arthroscopy in Acute Injuries at the ABC Medical Center), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05807945 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Intra-articular Administration of 0.2% Ropivacaine vs. 0.75% Ropivacaine as an Analgesic in the Immediate Postoperative Period of Knee Arthroscopy in Acute Injuries at the ABC Medical Center

TypeinterventionalSponsorPaola M Zamora MunozRan2020 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsKnee Arthroscopy, Acute PainArmsRopivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution, Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ranajit PanigrahiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hi-Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ritesh RoyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Hi-Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Amita Kumari MahapatraDepartment of Physiology, Hi-Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Anju PrasadDepartment of Pharmacology, Hi-Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ashok PriyadarshiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hi-Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Nishit PaloDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hi-Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Hi-Tech Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveKnee arthroscopy is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure. Post-operatively, adequate pain relief reduces the surgical stress response and patient's morbidity and facilitates rehabilitation. The analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine (2 μg/kg body weight) as an adjunct to ropivacaine in knee arthroscopic knee procedures was studied to determine whether this would achieve longer post-operative analgesia and whether the study dosage of dexmedetomidine was safe and free of adverse effects. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a multicenter prospective double blind trial of sixty patients undergoing knee arthroscopic procedures, patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group R, receiving intra-articular ropivacaine (20 mL); Group D1 (18 mL ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg body weight); and Group D2 (18 mL ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg).

resultsGroup D2 had significantly lower pain scores for the first 12 postoperative hours than Group D1 and Group R. Time to first analgesic requirement was longest in Group D2 (757.30 ± 207.68 min), followed by Group D1 (433.2 ± 54.3 min) and Group R (311.80 ± 61.56 min); these differences were significant (P < 0.05). Total analgesic requirement was significantly lower in Group D2 (82.50 ± 48.05 mg; P < 0.05). Intensity of pain was significantly less in Group D2 in the third (P < 0.01) and sixth hours (P < 0.05).

conclusionIntra-articular dexmedetomidine (2 μg/kg) has superior analgesic efficacy, delayed the first postoperative requirement for analgesia and decreasing the need for postoperative analgesics with no major adverse effects.

Indexed as

AdultAmidesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, LocalArthroscopyBlood PressureDexmedetomidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsFemaleHeart RateHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularKnee JointAmidesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, LocalDexmedetomidineDrug CombinationsRopivacaineArthroscopyDexmedetomidinePain relief

Identifiers

PMID26311100
PMCPMC6583730
OpenAlexW1957540814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.