ReviewDer Anaesthesist2015
[Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography in non-cardiac surgery. Update].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transesophageal echocardiography: Revolutionizing perioperative cardiac care.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Review
- Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2019Review
- Assessment of limited chest x-ray technique in postcardiac surgery management.Annals of cardiac anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this article is to impart knowledge concerning focused transesophageal echocardiographic examination (TEE) for non-cardiac surgery which is an essential part of perioperative monitoring. It allows a rapid echocardiographic examination without interference with the surgical field or under limited transthoracic examination conditions. New recommendations for a comprehensive perioperative TEE examination with expanded standard views and the recently published consensus statement for a shortened baseline examination were crucial for this study. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe background is the peer-reviewed literature from PubMed.
resultsApart from cardiac surgery TEE has two main applications: firstly, the evaluation of patients developing acute life-threatening hemodynamic instability in the operating room, in the emergency room or in the intensive care unit (ICU). Secondly, TEE is used as planned intraoperative monitoring when severe hemodynamic, pulmonary or neurological complications are expected because of the type of surgery or due to the cardiopulmonary medical history of the patient. In 2013 a total of 11 relevant standard views were defined for the basic perioperative TEE examination in non-cardiac surgery. These 11 views should be performed for each patient. Appropriate extension to a comprehensive examination may be necessary if complex pathology is obvious. DISCUSSION: Even in non-cardiac surgery TEE is an important tool allowing clarification of a life-threatening perioperative hemodynamic instability within a few minutes. Furthermore, the hemodynamic management of high-risk patients can be facilitated. Appropriate qualification and continuous training are necessary in order to assure the competence of the examiner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.