Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310842›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.

Carsten Oliver Schmidt, T Kohlmann, M Pfingsten, G Lindena, U Marnitz, K Pfeifer, J F Chenot

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of a short form of the Hong Kong Chinese orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carsten Oliver SchmidtInstitute for Community Medicine, SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. carsten.schmidt@uni-greifswald.de.
T KohlmannInstitute for Community Medicine, Methods of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
M PfingstenSchmerztagesklinik und Ambulanz, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
G LindenaClara Institute, Kleinmachnow, Clara-Zetkin-Str. 34, 14532, Kleinmachnow, Germany.
U MarnitzDepartment of General Practice, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
K PfeiferInstitute of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstrasse 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
J F ChenotDepartment of General Practice, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstr. 42-44, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecognizing patients at risk of developing chronic low back pain is essential for targeted interventions. One of the best researched screening instruments for this purpose is the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMSPQ). This work addresses psychometric properties of the German ÖMSPQ short form and its construct and prognostic validity.

methodsAnalyses are based on a cluster-randomized trial assessing a risk tailored intervention for patients consulting for low back pain in 35 general practices. A total of 360 patients consulting for acute and sub-acute back pain, aged 20-60 years, were included. All patients received a 10-item German short version of the ÖMSPQ, and other generic instruments (Graded Chronic Pain Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression, Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). The construct validity was assessed based on the factorial structure of the items and correlations with generic instruments. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated as measures of prognostic validity.

resultsÖMSPQ items belonging to the same subscale correlated highest among each other. The internal consistency of the ÖMSPQ items was 0.80 (Cronbach's α). The factorial structure corresponds with theoretic expectations. ÖMSPQ subscales on pain related disability, depression, and fear-avoidance beliefs correlated highest with their counterpart generic scales. The AUC for three ÖMSPQ-based prediction models ranged from 0.77 to 0.81.

conclusionsOur results support a satisfactory factorial and prognostic validity of the German short ÖMSPQ. The instrument may guide the provision of targeted interventions. Further research should link it to targeted treatments.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsPsychological TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultChronic PainDisability EvaluationFemaleGermanyHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPrognosisPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsBack painConstruct validityGeneral practiceÖrebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaireScreeningYellow flags

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.