Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310630›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2016

Combination Therapy With Reovirus and Anti-PD-1 Blockade Controls Tumor Growth Through Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses.

Karishma Rajani, Christopher Parrish, Timothy Kottke, Jill Thompson, Shane Zaidi, Liz Ilett, Kevin G Shim, Rosa-Maria Diaz, Hardev Pandha, Kevin Harrington and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Loss of ICOSL expression in the progression to cervical carcinoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. NK cells as powerful therapeutic tool in cancer immunotherapy.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Current advances in microbial-based cancer therapies.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Karishma RajaniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Christopher ParrishCancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Timothy KottkeDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jill ThompsonDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Shane ZaidiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Liz IlettCancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Kevin G ShimDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rosa-Maria DiazDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Hardev PandhaUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Kevin HarringtonThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Matt CoffeyOncolytics Biotech Incorporated, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alan MelcherCancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Richard VileDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USCancer Research UK · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBOncolytics Biotech (Canada) · CASt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Targeted MV-CEA as a Potent Antitumor Agent against GBMP50CA108961 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI O'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICK · 2004 to 2015
$22.5M
T Cell Based Carriers for In Vivo Gene Therapy of CancerR01CA107082 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
Autoimmunity and anti tumor immunity outside of the melanocyte/melanoma paradigmR01CA132734 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Enhancing Systemic Delivery of Oncolytic Viruses for Cancer TherapyR01CA130878 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
Enhancing Therapy of Primary and Recurrent Tumors With Systemic Oncolytic VirusR01CA175386 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
Cancer Research UKNCI NIH HHS CA108961NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108961NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107082NCI NIH HHS R01 CA130878NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132734NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175386NCI NIH HHS R01CA175386-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic reovirus can be delivered both systemically and intratumorally, in both preclinical models and in early phase clinical trials. Reovirus has direct oncolytic activity against a variety of tumor types and antitumor activity is directly associated with immune activation by virus replication in tumors. Immune mechanisms of therapy include both innate immune activation against virally infected tumor cells, and the generation of adaptive antitumor immune responses as a result of in vivo priming against tumor-associated antigens. We tested the combination of local oncolytic reovirus therapy with systemic immune checkpoint inhibition. We show that treatment of subcutaneous B16 melanomas with a combination of intravenous (i.v.) anti-PD-1 antibody and intratumoral (i.t.) reovirus significantly enhanced survival of mice compared to i.t. reovirus (P < 0.01) or anti-PD-1 therapy alone. In vitro immune analysis demonstrated that checkpoint inhibition improved the ability of NK cells to kill reovirus-infected tumor cells, reduced T(reg) activity, and increased the adaptive CD8(+) T-cell-dependent antitumor T-cell response. PD-1 blockade also enhanced the antiviral immune response but through effector mechanisms which overlapped with but also differed from those affecting the antitumor response. Therefore, combination with checkpoint inhibition represents a readily translatable next step in the clinical development of reovirus viroimmunotherapy.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsAntibodiesCombined Modality TherapyImmunity, InnateMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReoviridaeSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntibodiesProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID26310630
PMCPMC4754544
OpenAlexW1936207051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.