Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310580›Full record

ArticleRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2016

Studying respiratory rhythm generation in a developing bird: Hatching a new experimental model using the classic in vitro brainstem-spinal cord preparation.

Michael A Vincen-Brown, Kaitlyn C Whitesitt, Forrest G Quick, Jason Q Pilarski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The avian embryo as a time-honoured animal model in developmental, biomedical and agricultural research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A Vincen-BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83 209, USA.
Kaitlyn C WhitesittDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83 209, USA.
Forrest G QuickDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83 209, USA.
Jason Q PilarskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83 209, USA; Department of Dental Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83 209 USA. Electronic address: pilajaso@isu.edu.
Idaho State University · US

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Carolyn Hovde Bohach · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
Mechanisms of respiratory-related rhythmic motor activity and plasticity in the developing avian brain stemR15NS087521 · NINDS · IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PILARSKI, JASON QUINN · 2014 to 2020
$721k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NINDS NIH HHS 1R15NS087521-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS087521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been more than thirty years since the in vitro brainstem-spinal cord preparation was first presented as a method to study automatic breathing behaviors in the neonatal rat. This straightforward preparation has led to an incredible burst of information about the location and coordination of several spontaneously active microcircuits that form the ventrolateral respiratory network of the brainstem. Despite these advances, our knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate central breathing behaviors is still incomplete. Investigations into the nature of spontaneous breathing rhythmicity have almost exclusively focused on mammals, and there is a need for comparative experimental models to evaluate several unresolved issues from a different perspective. With this in mind, we sought to develop a new avian in vitro model with the long term goal to better understand questions associated with the ontogeny of respiratory rhythm generation, neuroplasticity, and whether multiple, independent oscillators drive the major phases of breathing. The fact that birds develop in ovo provides unparalleled access to central neuronal networks throughout the prenatal period - from embryo to hatchling - that are free from confounding interactions with mother. Previous studies using in vitro avian models have been strictly limited to the early embryonic period. Consequently, the details and even the presence of brainstem derived breathing-related rhythmogenesis in birds have never been described. In the present study, we used the altricial zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) and show robust spontaneous motor outflow through cranial motor nerve IX, which is first detectable on embryonic day four and continues through prenatal and early postnatal development without interruption. We also show that brainstem oscillations change dramatically over the course of prenatal development, sometimes within hours, which suggests rapid maturational modifications in growth and connectivity. We propose that this experimental preparation will be useful for a variety of studies aimed at testing the biophysical and synaptic properties of neurons that participate in the unique spatiotemporal patterns of avian breathing behaviors, especially in the context of early development.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBrain StemCentral Pattern GeneratorsElectrophysiologyEmbryo, NonmammalianFinchesOrgan Culture TechniquesSpinal CordBirdsBreathingCentral pattern generationDevelopment and maturationIn vitro brainstem-spinal cord preparationZebra finch

Identifiers

PMID26310580
PMCPMC4766073
OpenAlexW2194599077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.