Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310538›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2016

Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Efstathia Andrikopoulou, Fadi G Hage

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Prognostic value of absent left ventricular ejection fraction reserve with regadenoson SPECT MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Relationship between heart rate response and cardiac innervation in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  5. Myocardial perfusion artifacts in left bundle branch block: A diagnostic challenge.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Stress cardiomyopathy associated with vasodilator stress testing.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk stratification for renal transplantation: A role for heart rate response?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Myocardial stunning by gated SPECT: An old tool reinvented in a stunning turn.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Indirect evidence of sympathetic stimulation by regadenoson.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Adverse effects associated with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  16. The heart rate response to regadenoson in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  17. The blood pressure response to vasodilator stress does not provide independent prognostic information.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  19. Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Efstathia AndrikopoulouDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1720 2nd AVE S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0007, USA.
Fadi G HageDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1720 2nd AVE S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0007, USA. fadihage@uab.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PurinesHeart RateMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPyrazolesVasodilator AgentsPurinesPyrazolesregadenosonVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.