ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a preliminary report.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study of the Feasibility and Safety of No-scar Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Without Conventional Laparoscopic Assistance
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer (TaLaR): a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial
Laparoscopic Assisted Transanal Resection of Rectal Cancer With Total Mesorectal Excision
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of pathological outcomes after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a prospective study using data from randomized control trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- The Treatment Efficacy for Patients Undergoing Combined Transanal-Transabdominal Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Anastomosis Stenosis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- IRIS U kit usefulness in transanal total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer to avoid urethral injury.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Transanal and transabdominal combined endoscopic resection of rectal stenosis and anal reconstruction based on transanal endoscopic technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Computer-assisted real-time automatic prostate segmentation during TaTME: a single-center feasibility study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Impact of pelvic dimensions on anastomotic leak after anterior resection for patients with rectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (TaLaR trial) protocol.Gastroenterology report · 2021Article
- Pure transanal endoscopic colectomy for ascending colon cancer.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicentric cohort study.Gastroenterology report · 2020Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: hype or new hope?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Review
- Safety and Feasibility of Transanal Endoscopic Surgery for Diffuse Cavernous Hemangioma of the Rectum.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
- Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: From top to bottom.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2018Review
- Evolution of surgery for rectal cancer: Transanal total mesorectal excision~new standard or fad?~.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2018Review
- Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer: No surgery, minimal surgery or minimally invasive surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2017Review
- Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision as a surgical procedure for diffuse cavernous hemangioma of the rectum: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, the majority cases of the novel down-to-up transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) were performed in a hybrid approach with conventional laparoscopic assistance because of less operative difficulty. However, although cases are limited, the successes of TaTME in a pure approach (without laparoscopic assistance) indicate that the costly and less mini-invasive hybrid TaTME could be potentially avoided.
methodsIn the present single institutional, prospective study, we attempted to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of this approach in rectal cancer by evaluating the short-term results of our first 20 TaTME cases. For the majority of cases, we adopted a strategy that laparoscopic assistance was not introduced unless it was required during the planned pure TaTME procedure.
resultsA total of 20 patients (12 males and 8 females) were analyzed in this study, including 11 cases (55 %) of pure TaTME and 9 cases (45 %) of hybrid TaTME. Overall, the median operative time was 200 min (range 70-420), along with a median estimated blood loss of 50 ml (range 20-800). Morbidity rate was 20 % (one urethral injury, two urinary retentions, one anastomotic hemorrhage and one mild anastomotic leak). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 12 (range 1-20). All specimens were intact in mesorectum without positive distal and circumferential resection margins. Among the 15 patients who were preoperatively scheduled to undertake pure TaTME, four patients (26.7 %) required converting to laparoscopic assistance. Moreover, among these 15 patients, the results of the comparative analysis between female and male subgroups favor the former, suggesting easier operation in them.
conclusionThis preliminary study demonstrates that TaTME in rectal cancer is safe and feasible. The strategy of not introducing laparoscopic assistance unless it is required while performing the planned pTaTME should be cautiously explored. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26310534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.