Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310396›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Examining the role of Scotland's telephone advice service (NHS 24) for managing health in the community: analysis of routinely collected NHS 24 data.

Alison M Elliott, Anne McAteer, David Heaney, Lewis D Ritchie, Philip C Hannaford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of the performance of telephone triage service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinician-led secondary triage in England's urgent care delivery: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Investigating the public's use of Scotland's primary care telephone advice service (NHS 24): a population-based cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison M ElliottDivision of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Anne McAteerDivision of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
David HeaneyCentre for Rural Health, The Centre for Health Science, Inverness, UK.
Lewis D RitchieDivision of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Philip C HannafordDivision of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the type, duration and outcome of the symptoms and health problems Scotland's nurse-led telephone advice service (NHS 24) is contacted about and explore whether these vary by time of contact and patient characteristics.

designAnalysis of routinely collected NHS 24 data.

settingScotland, UK.

participantsUsers of NHS 24 during 2011.

main outcome measuresProportion of the type, duration and outcome of the symptoms and health problems NHS 24 is contacted about.

results82.6% of the calls were made out-of-hours and 17.4% in-hours. Abdominal problems accounted for the largest proportion of calls (12.2%) followed by dental (6.8%) and rash/skin problems (6.0%). There were differences in the type of problems presented in-hours and out-of-hours. Most problems (62.9%) had lasted <24 h before people contacted NHS 24. Out-of-hours calls tended to be for problems of shorter duration. Problems reported out-of-hours most commonly resulted in advice to visit an out-of-hours centre and in-hours advice to contact a general practitioner. Most of the service users were female and from more affluent areas. Use of the service declined with age in those over 35 years. The characteristics of users varied according to when NHS 24 was contacted. The number of calls made by an individual in the year ranged from 1 to 866, although most users (69.2%) made only one call. The type of problem presented varied by age and deprivation, but was broadly similar by gender, rural/urban status and geographic area. Call outcomes also varied by user characteristics.

conclusionsThis is the first study to examine how the public uses NHS 24. It has identified the patterns of problems which the service must be equipped to deal with. It has also provided important information about who uses the service and when. This information will help future planning and development of the service.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareCommunity Health ServicesResidence CharacteristicsTelephoneTriageAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolData CollectionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26310396
PMCPMC4554912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.