Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310261›Full record

Trial reportHeart (British Cardiac Society)2015

Perioperative elafin for ischaemia-reperfusion injury during coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised-controlled trial.

S R Alam, S C Lewis, V Zamvar, R Pessotto, M R Dweck, A Krishan, K Goodman, K Oatey, R Harkess, L Milne and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Effect of ischemia-reperfusion injury on elafin levels in rat liver.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Update on novel targets and potential treatment avenues in pulmonary hypertension.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S R AlamBritish Heart Foundation/Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK.
S C LewisEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
V ZamvarDepartment of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
R PessottoDepartment of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
M R DweckBritish Heart Foundation/Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK.
A KrishanEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
K GoodmanEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
K OateyEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
R HarkessEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
L MilneEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
S ThomasEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
N M MillsBritish Heart Foundation/Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK.
C MooreDepartment of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
S SempleClinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
O WiedowDepartment of Dermatology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
C StirratBritish Heart Foundation/Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK.
S MirsadraeeClinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
D E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation/Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK Clinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
P A HenriksenBritish Heart Foundation/Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBWestern General Hospital · GBKiel University · DE

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/09/002British Heart Foundation FS/12/83/29781British Heart Foundation FS/13/77/30488British Heart Foundation FS/14/78/31020Chief Scientist Office ETM/266Medical Research Council G0701127Medical Research Council G1001339Wellcome Trust 103782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElafin is a potent endogenous neutrophil elastase inhibitor that protects against myocardial inflammation and injury in preclinical models of ischaemic-reperfusion injury. We investigated whether elafin could inhibit myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury induced during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS AND

resultsIn a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group clinical trial, 87 patients undergoing CABG surgery were randomised 1:1 to intravenous elafin 200 mg or saline placebo administered after induction of anaesthesia and prior to sternotomy. Myocardial injury was measured as cardiac troponin I release over 48 h (area under the curve (AUC)) and myocardial infarction identified with MRI. Postischaemic inflammation was measured by plasma markers including AUC high-sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Elafin infusion was safe and resulted in >3000-fold increase in plasma elafin concentrations and >50% inhibition of elastase activity in the first 24 h. This did not reduce myocardial injury over 48 h (ratio of geometric means (elafin/placebo) of AUC troponin I 0.74 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.15, p=0.18)) although post hoc analysis of the high-sensitive assay revealed lower troponin I concentrations at 6 h in elafin-treated patients (median 2.4 vs 4.1 μg/L, p=0.035). Elafin had no effect on myocardial infarction (elafin, 7/34 vs placebo, 5/35 patients) or on markers of inflammation: mean differences for AUC hs-CRP of 499 mg/L/48 h (95% CI -207 to 1205, p=0.16), and AUC MPO of 238 ng/mL/48 h (95% CI -235 to 711, p=0.320).

conclusionsThere was no strong evidence that neutrophil elastase inhibition with a single-dose elafin treatment reduced myocardial injury and inflammation following CABG-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (EudraCT 2010-019527-58, ISRCTN82061264).

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodElafinFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntraoperative ComplicationsIntraoperative PeriodMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryProtease InhibitorsRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesElafinProtease InhibitorsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26310261
PMCPMC4621368
OpenAlexW1929906891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.