Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26310243›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

A survey of the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China.

Xiaoyu Xi, Weixia Li, Jun Li, Xuan Zhu, Cong Fu, Xu Wei, Shuzhen Chu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Availability of Essential Medicines in a Country in Conflict: A Quantitative Insight from Yemen.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoyu XiSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. cpuxixiaoyu@163.com.
Weixia LiSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. liweixia1990@126.com.
Jun LiSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. lijun0607@163.com.
Xuan ZhuSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. zhuxuan1022@163.com.
Cong FuSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. fucong0909@126.com.
Xu WeiSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. weixu8525@126.com.
Shuzhen ChuSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business at China Pharmaceutical University, No.639 Longmian Street, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. csz77844@163.com.
China Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundField surveys conducted in China before the implementation of the essential medicine policy showed that Chinese individuals faced less access to essential medicines. This paper aims to evaluate the availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines in Jiangsu Province, China after the implementation of the policy in 2009.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in Jiangsu in 2013 using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Data on the availability and prices of 50 essential medicines were collected from the public and private healthcare sectors.

resultsThe mean availabilities of innovator brands and lowest priced generics (LPGs) were 11.5% and 100% in primary healthcare facilities, 36.8% and 32.6% in the secondary and tertiary sectors, and 18.7% and 42.9% in the private sector, respectively. The median price ratios (MPRs) were 1.26 to 2.05 for generics and 3.76 to 27.22 for innovator brands. Treating ten common diseases with LPGs was generally affordable, whereas treatment with IBs was less affordable.

conclusionsThe high availability of LPGs at primary healthcare facilities reflects the success of the essential medicine policy, while the low availability in secondary and tertiary levels and in private pharmacies reflects a failure to implement the policy in these levels. The health policy should be fully developed and enforced at the secondary and tertiary levels and in the private sector to ensure equitable access to health services.

Indexed as

CommerceChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDrugs, EssentialFinancing, PersonalHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPharmaciesPrivate SectorSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health OrganizationDrugs, Essential

Identifiers

PMID26310243
PMCPMC4549946
OpenAlexW2155471542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.