ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
The association and interaction analysis of metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease on cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in the general Chinese population.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate associations of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN), and to estimate the extent to which interaction of MetS and CKD affects the outcome in the Chinese population.
methodWe conducted a large-scale, population-based study to analyze the association and interaction of the two factors for CAN in a sample of 2,092 Chinese people. Univariate and multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis were employed to detect these relationships. Interaction on an additive scale can be calculated by using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), the proportion attributable to interaction (AP), and the synergy index (S).
resultsMLR adjusted for confounding factors showed that MetS was independently associated with CAN (P < 0.001). A significant interaction effect was detected by MLR (P = 0.042). In addition, a positive interaction between MetS and CKD on CAN was estimated by using parameters of RETI = 0.119 (95% CI: 0.059-0.178), AP = 0.049 (95% CI: -0.039-0.138) and S = 1.091 (95% CI: 0.164-2.019).
conclusionOur findings suggest that MetS is independently associated with CAN and offer evidence to support the hypothesis that MetS and CKD have positive interactions on CAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26309639PMC4538176W1173539388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.