Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26309615›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

The association study on renalase polymorphism and hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Wei-Bin Shi, Hong-Yong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Renalase: a novel regulator of cardiometabolic and renal diseases.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei-Bin ShiDepartment of Cardiology, Daping Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing Institute of Cardiology Chongqing 400042, P.R. China.
Hong-Yong WangDepartment of Cardiology, Daping Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing Institute of Cardiology Chongqing 400042, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is considered a multi-factorial disease since its development is affected by both genetic and environmental factors. Intensive efforts have been focused on identifying gene(s) related to hypertension. Renalase is a recently discovered protein that expressed in kidney, heart, liver, and brain that metabolizes catecholamines, regulation of blood pressure in humans and animals. A common missense polymorphism in the flavin-adenine dinucleotide-binding domain of human renalase (Glu37Asp) has recently been described. But the reported results are not always consistent. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between (Glu37Asp) polymorphism (rs2296545) in renalase gene and risk of hypertension. Through a systematic literature search for publications between 2007 and 2014, we summarized the data from 4 studies on polymorphism (rs2296545) in renalase gene and risk of hypertension. We did not find any association of rs2296545 with risk of hypertension in dominant model (OR=0.64; 95% CI: 0.41-1.00), recessive model (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 0.95-1.75), co-dominant model (OR=1.38, 95% CI: 0.92-2.08), and allelic model (OR=1.19; 95% CI: 0.96-1.47). The results of the present study indicated that the renalase genetic polymorphism was not associated with risk of hypertension.

Indexed as

hypertensionmeta-analysispolymorphismRenalase gene

Identifiers

PMID26309615
PMCPMC4537962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.