ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that is influenced by many factors. Several studies have investigated the relationship between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk, but the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis covering a large sample size to address this controversy.
methodsEligible studies were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. A total of 7 studies from 6 publications with 2035 cases and 3096 controls were included. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated by the fixed or random effects to evaluate the correlation between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and HCC risk. The Q statistic and I(2) statistic were used to assess the statistical heterogeneity among studies. Publication bias was evaluated by Egger's linear regression test and Begg's funnel plot.
resultsIn present study, the results showed that MTHFR A1298C polymorphism was not significantly associated with risk of HCC based on CC + AC vs. AA genetic model (OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.90-1.13). Similarly, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant HCC risk was found in Asian population (OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.91-1.14). In the subgroup analysis based on source of control, we found that MTHFR A1298C polymorphism showed no effects on the occurrence of HCC in the population-based (PB) and hospital-based (HB) group (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.83-1.15; OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.89-1.21).
conclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that MTHFR A1298C polymorphism may not be a risk factor for HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26309569PMC4538033W2417639331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.