Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26309529›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Electrophysiological and histopathological effects of mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of experimental rat model of sciatic nerve injury.

Ercan Yarar, Enis Kuruoglu, Ersoy Kocabıcak, Adnan Altun, Eyup Genc, Hamit Ozyurek, Mehmet Kefeli, Abdullah Hilmi Marangoz, Keramettin Aydın, Cengiz Cokluk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ercan YararDepartment of Neurosurgery, Atatürk State Hospital Sinop, Turkey.
Enis KuruogluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.
Ersoy KocabıcakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.
Adnan AltunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medicana Private Hospital Samsun, Turkey.
Eyup GencDepartment of Neurosurgery, Turhal State Hospital Tokat, Turkey.
Hamit OzyurekDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.
Mehmet KefeliDepartment of Pathology, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.
Abdullah Hilmi MarangozDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.
Keramettin AydınDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.
Cengiz CoklukDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate electrophysiological and histopathological effects of mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of sciatic nerve injury. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty-two female Spraque-Dawley rat were used in this study. Eight rats were used as a reference group in electrophysiological analysis for evaluation of non-injured nerve recordings (Control Group). Twenty-four rats were used for experimental evaluation. Twelve rats were anastomosed without treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (Sham Group) and twelve other rats were anastomosed and treated with mesenchymal stem cells (Stem Cell Group). Surgicel and bioglue were used in anastomosed line in both Groups. Eight weeks after the surgery, electrophysiological evaluation of rats was performed and, then, rats were decapitated under anesthesia and specimens including sciatic nerves and anastomosed line were taken for histopathological evaluation. Electromyography and nerve conduction velocity testing and histopathological scoring including rate of Wallerian degeneration, and neuroma and scar formation were evaluated for both Groups.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences between Sham and Stem Cell Groups with respect to histopathological evaluation. However, nerve conduction velocity showed significant difference between groups (P = 0.001). Nerve conduction velocity was significantly improved in Stem Cell Group when compared to Sham Group.

conclusionIn this study, based on nerve conduction velocity data, it was concluded that treatment with mesenchymal stem cells during end-to-end anastomosis improves functional regeneration.

Indexed as

experimental sciatic nerve injuryMesenchymal stem cellsnerve conduction velocityscar tissue

Identifiers

PMID26309529
PMCPMC4537965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.