ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2015
Navigating the chemical space of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insight into TLR4 receptor inhibitory activityRSC advances · 2023Article
- Evolution of Sequence-based Bioinformatics Tools for Protein-protein Interaction Prediction.Current genomics · 2020Review
- PVPred-SCM: Improved Prediction and Analysis of Phage Virion Proteins Using a Scoring Card Method.Cells · 2020Article
- iQSP: A Sequence-Based Tool for the Prediction and Analysis of Quorum Sensing Peptides via Chou's 5-Steps Rule and Informative Physicochemical Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Meta-iAVP: A Sequence-Based Meta-Predictor for Improving the Prediction of Antiviral Peptides Using Effective Feature Representation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- ThalPred: a web-based prediction tool for discriminating thalassemia trait and iron deficiency anemia.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- ACPred: A Computational Tool for the Prediction and Analysis of Anticancer Peptides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Rational design of novel sirtuin 1 activators via structure-activity insights from application of QSAR modeling.EXCLI journal · 2019Article
- Unraveling the bioactivity of anticancer peptides as deduced from machine learning.EXCLI journal · 2018Review
- Proteomic and bioinformatic discovery of biomarkers for diabetic nephropathy.EXCLI journal · 2018Review
- Machine Learning and Data Mining Methods in Diabetes Research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study represents the first large-scale study on the chemical space of inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), which is a potential therapeutic protein target for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Herein, a large set of 2,937 compounds evaluated for their ability to inhibit DPP4 was compiled from the literature. Molecular descriptors were generated from the geometrically optimized low-energy conformers of these compounds at the semiempirical AM1 level. The origins of DPP4 inhibitory activity were elucidated from computed molecular descriptors that accounted for the unique physicochemical properties inherently present in the active and inactive sets of compounds as defined by their respective half maximal inhibitory concentration values of less than 1 μM and greater than 10 μM, respectively. Decision tree analysis revealed the importance of molecular weight, total energy of a molecule, topological polar surface area, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, and number of hydrogen-bond donors, which correspond to molecular size, energy, surface polarity, electron acceptors, and hydrogen bond donors, respectively. The prediction model was subjected to rigorous independent testing via three external sets. Scaffold and chemical fragment analysis was also performed on these active and inactive sets of compounds to shed light on the distinguishing features of the functional moieties. Docking of representative active DPP4 inhibitors was also performed to unravel key interacting residues. The results of this study are anticipated to be useful in guiding the rational design of novel and robust DPP4 inhibitors for the treatment of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.