ArticleBiomarker insights2015
Analysis of Lung Flute-collected Sputum for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in Biomarker insights, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNA-21 was a promising biomarker for lung carcinoma diagnosis: An update meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2022Pooled it
- High diagnostic value of miRNAs for NSCLC: quantitative analysis for both single and combined miRNAs in lung cancer.Annals of medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Sputum Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Subtyping, Surveillance, Response Prediction, and Prognostication: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Use of the Lung Flute ECO to assist in sputum collection for tuberculosis testing: a randomised crossover trial.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- [Role and Significance of Bioactive Substances in Sputum in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021Review
- High-Throughput Detection of Multiple miRNAs and Methylated DNA by Droplet Digital PCR.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Microbiota Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An integromic signature for lung cancer early detection.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- miRNAs as biomarkers and for the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- A classifier integrating plasma biomarkers and radiological characteristics for distinguishing malignant from benign pulmonary nodules.International journal of cancer · 2017Article
- A prediction model for distinguishing lung squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Novel therapies for perioperative respiratory complications.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2017Review
- Diagnosing Lung Cancers through Examination of Micro-RNA Biomarkers in Blood, Plasma, Serum and Sputum: A Review and Summary of Current Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular analysis of sputum can help diagnose lung cancer. We have demonstrated that Lung Flute can be used to collect sputum from individuals who cannot spontaneously expectorate sputum. The objective of this study is to further evaluate the performance of the Lung Flute by comparing the characteristics of parallel samples collected with and without the Lung Flute and the usefulness for diagnosis of lung cancer. Fifty-six early-stage lung cancer patients (40 current smokers and 16 former smokers) and 73 cancer-free individuals (52 current smokers and 21 former smokers) were instructed to spontaneously cough and use Lung Flute for sputum sampling. Sputum cytology and polymerase chain reaction analysis of three miRNAs (miRs-21, 31, and 210) were performed in the specimens. All 92 current smokers and 11 (28.7%) of 37 former smokers spontaneously expectorated sputum and also produced sputum when using the Lung Flute. Twenty-seven former smokers (70.3%) who could not spontaneously expectorate sputum, however, were able to produce sputum when using the Lung Flute. The specimens were of low respiratory origin without contamination from other sources, eg, saliva. There was no difference of sputum volume and cell populations, diagnostic efficiency of cytology, and analysis of the miRNAs in the specimens collected by the two approaches. Analysis of the sputum miRNAs produced 83.93% sensitivity and 87.67% specificity for identifying lung cancer. Therefore, sputum collected by the Lung Flute has comparable features as spontaneously expectorated sputum. Using the Lung Flute enables former smokers who cannot spontaneously expectorate to provide adequate sputum to improve sputum collection for lung cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.