Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26309391›Full record

ArticleBiomarker insights2015

Analysis of Lung Flute-collected Sputum for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.

Jian Su, Nigar Anjuman, Maria A Guarnera, Howard Zhang, Sanford A Stass, Feng Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker insights, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Role and Significance of Bioactive Substances in Sputum
 in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Microbiota Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel therapies for perioperative respiratory complications.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian SuDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nigar AnjumanDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Maria A GuarneraDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Howard ZhangDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sanford A StassDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Feng JiangDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Non-invasive Biomarker Panels for Early Detection of Lung Squamous Cell CarcinomaR01CA161837 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIANG, FENG · 2011 to 2013
$998k
Early detection of lung cancer in VeteransI01CX000512 · VA · BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, FENG · 2012 to 2020
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000512NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular analysis of sputum can help diagnose lung cancer. We have demonstrated that Lung Flute can be used to collect sputum from individuals who cannot spontaneously expectorate sputum. The objective of this study is to further evaluate the performance of the Lung Flute by comparing the characteristics of parallel samples collected with and without the Lung Flute and the usefulness for diagnosis of lung cancer. Fifty-six early-stage lung cancer patients (40 current smokers and 16 former smokers) and 73 cancer-free individuals (52 current smokers and 21 former smokers) were instructed to spontaneously cough and use Lung Flute for sputum sampling. Sputum cytology and polymerase chain reaction analysis of three miRNAs (miRs-21, 31, and 210) were performed in the specimens. All 92 current smokers and 11 (28.7%) of 37 former smokers spontaneously expectorated sputum and also produced sputum when using the Lung Flute. Twenty-seven former smokers (70.3%) who could not spontaneously expectorate sputum, however, were able to produce sputum when using the Lung Flute. The specimens were of low respiratory origin without contamination from other sources, eg, saliva. There was no difference of sputum volume and cell populations, diagnostic efficiency of cytology, and analysis of the miRNAs in the specimens collected by the two approaches. Analysis of the sputum miRNAs produced 83.93% sensitivity and 87.67% specificity for identifying lung cancer. Therefore, sputum collected by the Lung Flute has comparable features as spontaneously expectorated sputum. Using the Lung Flute enables former smokers who cannot spontaneously expectorate to provide adequate sputum to improve sputum collection for lung cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

diagnosisgenesLung Flutelung tumorsputum

Identifiers

PMID26309391
PMCPMC4526230
OpenAlexW1869977405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.