Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26309367›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

High expression of CD11c indicates favorable prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Yuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Bin-Feng Lu, Yue-Ping Shen, Jing-Ting Jiang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adhesion forces between macrophages and cancer cells promote early tumor development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dendritic cell-targeting chemokines inhibit colorectal cancer progression.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuan WangYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Bin XuYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wen-Wei HuYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Lu-Jun ChenYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chang-Ping WuYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Bin-Feng LuYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yue-Ping ShenYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jing-Ting JiangYuan Wang, Bin Xu, Wen-Wei Hu, Lu-Jun Chen, Chang-Ping Wu, Jing-Ting Jiang, Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the relationship between CD11c expression level and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

methodsThis retrospective survival study was performed from July 31, 2008 to June 30, 2014. Our study inclusion criteria included all the patients with GC who underwent surgical resection between January 1998 and December 2009 in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. CD11c expression levels in 140 patients with GC at different UICC stages were evaluated using immunohistochemistry, and GC tissues from 16 cases were further verified by qRT-PCR. The χ (2) test was used to compare the patient- and disease-related factors between the low CD11c expression group and the high expression group. Univariate probabilities of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log rank test was used to compare survival curves. Different multivariate COX models were used to estimate the association between CD11c expression and both death and recurrence risk in GC patients.

resultsThe average CD11c expression level was 5.1 ± 1.8/high power field (HPF) in 10 gastritis samples, 4.5 ± 2.3/HPF in 10 gastric polyp samples and 9.7 ± 6.3/HPF in 140 gastric cancer samples, respectively. The CD11c expression level was significantly decreased from UICC stage I to stage IV (stage I: 16.0 ± 7.4, stage II: 10.4 ± 5.5, stage III: 9.4 ± 6.1, stage IV: 5.3 ± 3.2, P < 0.001). Patients in the high CD11c expression group had a greater 3- and 5-year OS probability and longer median survival time compared with the low CD11c expression group, (67.7% vs 39.2%; 51.4% vs 29.0%; 67.0 mo vs 28.0 mo; χ(2) = 6.80, P = 0.009), and had a greater 3- and 5-year DFS probability and longer median DFS time (63.7% vs 24.0%; 49.1% vs 11.9%; 64.0 mo vs 18.0 mo; χ (2) = 15.39, P < 0.001). Patients with high CD11c high expression had a reduced risk of death (HR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.33-0.98, P < 0.05) and relapse (HR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.23-0.67, P < 0.01) compared with patients with low CD11c expression after adjustment of potential confounders, with the exception of tumor size. However, the protective effect related to death (HR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.49-1.67, P = 0.749) and relapse (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.36-1.19, P = 0.160) disappeared when tumor size was incorporated into the model.

conclusionHigh expression of CD11c decreased the risk of death and relapse, and may be regarded as an alternative indicator of favorable prognosis in patients with GC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCD11c AntigenChinaChi-Square DistributionDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionGastrectomyHospitals, UniversityHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, TumorCD11c AntigenCD11cDendritic cellGastric cancerTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID26309367
PMCPMC4541393
OpenAlexW2411072072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.