Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26309354›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status.

Arthur Schmidt, Benjamin Meier, Karel Caca

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03803891 (Multicenter Prospective Study of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03803891 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Prospective Study of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection (EFTR) in Colon Using Over-the-scope-clip (OTSC)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundació Institut Germans Trias i PujolRan2018 to 2020Enrolled65ConditionsColon Neoplasm, Malignant, Colo-rectal Cancer, Colonic Cancer, Colonic AdenomaArmsEndoscopic full-thickness resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recent Advances in Endoscopic Treatment Techniques for Subepithelial Lesions.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025
    Review
  3. Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRDDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gastrointestinal exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection in the era of endoscopic suturing: a retrospective single-center case series.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ASGE guideline for endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019
    Article
  18. Gut disease in systemic sclerosis - new approaches to common problems.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arthur SchmidtArthur Schmidt, Benjamin Meier, Karel Caca, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, 71640 Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Benjamin MeierArthur Schmidt, Benjamin Meier, Karel Caca, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, 71640 Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Karel CacaArthur Schmidt, Benjamin Meier, Karel Caca, Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, 71640 Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Klinikum Ludwigsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection are powerful tools for treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, those techniques are restricted to superficial layers of the gastrointestinal wall. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an evolving technique, which is just about to enter clinical routine. It is not only a powerful tool for diagnostic tissue acquisition but also has the potential to spare surgical therapy in selected patients. This review will give an overview about current EFTR techniques and devices.

Indexed as

Endoscopes, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEquipment DesignGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeColorectal adenomaColorectal carcinomaEndoscopic full-thickness resectionEndoscopic gastrointestinal surgeryOver-the-scope-clip

Identifiers

PMID26309354
PMCPMC4541380
OpenAlexW2409368455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.