Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26309350›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Oral Campylobacter species: Initiators of a subgroup of inflammatory bowel disease?

Li Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The oral microbiome in autoimmune diseases: friend or foe?Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Global epidemiology of campylobacteriosis and the impact of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of completeMicrobial genomics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Clinical Importance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li ZhangLi Zhang, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, a number of studies detected a significantly higher prevalence of Campylobacter species such as Campylobacter concisus (C. concisus) in intestinal biopsies and fecal samples collected from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared to controls. Most of these Campylobacter species are not of zoonotic origin but are human oral Campylobacter species. Bacterial species usually cause diseases in the location where they colonize. However, C. concisus and other oral Campylobacter species are associated with IBD occurring at the lower parts of the gastrointestinal tract, suggesting that these Campylobacter species may have unique virulence factors that are expressed in the lower parts of the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansIntestinesMouthRisk FactorsVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsCampylobacter concisusCrohn’s diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseOral Campylobacter speciesUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID26309350
PMCPMC4541376
OpenAlexW2407477253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.