Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26308508›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Mechanism for Collective Cell Alignment in Myxococcus xanthus Bacteria.

Rajesh Balagam, Oleg A Igoshin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dissecting the physics of bacterial biofilms with agent-based simulations.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell density, alignment, and orientation correlate with C-signal-dependent gene expression duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Linking single-cell decisions to collective behaviours in social bacteria.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. On the mechanism of long-range orientational order of fibroblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Data-driven modeling reveals cell behaviors controlling self-organization duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rajesh BalagamDepartment of Bioengineering and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Oleg A IgoshinDepartment of Bioengineering and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myxococcus xanthus cells self-organize into aligned groups, clusters, at various stages of their lifecycle. Formation of these clusters is crucial for the complex dynamic multi-cellular behavior of these bacteria. However, the mechanism underlying the cell alignment and clustering is not fully understood. Motivated by studies of clustering in self-propelled rods, we hypothesized that M. xanthus cells can align and form clusters through pure mechanical interactions among cells and between cells and substrate. We test this hypothesis using an agent-based simulation framework in which each agent is based on the biophysical model of an individual M. xanthus cell. We show that model agents, under realistic cell flexibility values, can align and form cell clusters but only when periodic reversals of cell directions are suppressed. However, by extending our model to introduce the observed ability of cells to deposit and follow slime trails, we show that effective trail-following leads to clusters in reversing cells. Furthermore, we conclude that mechanical cell alignment combined with slime-trail-following is sufficient to explain the distinct clustering behaviors observed for wild-type and non-reversing M. xanthus mutants in recent experiments. Our results are robust to variation in model parameters, match the experimentally observed trends and can be applied to understand surface motility patterns of other bacterial species.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacterial AdhesionCell MovementComputational BiologyMyxococcus xanthus

Identifiers

PMID26308508
PMCPMC4550276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.