Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26308198›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2015

Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders.

Alexis A Dieter, Maggie F Wilkins, Jennifer M Wu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05534412 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Practice-Based Intervention To Improve Care for a Diverse Population Of Women With Urinary Incontinence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2022 to 2027Enrolled1,600ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsAcademic Detailing, Electronic Clinical Decision Support, APP Co-management, Electronic Referral
NCT06040645 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Outcomes of Urinary Incontinence Treatment in Primary Care: APP Co-Management and Electronic Consult

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2024 to 2029Enrolled1,200ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsAPP Co-management, E-consult
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spanish validation of the German pelvic floor questionnaire for pregnant and postpartum women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis A DieterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Maggie F Wilkins
Jennifer M Wu

Funding

Translational Research in Pelvic Floor DisordersK23HD068404 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, JENNIFER M. · 2011 to 2014
$509k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD068404NICHD NIH HHS K23HD068404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe sought to provide a review of the recent literature regarding the prevalence and epidemiological trends in pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence. We also examined the current trends in surgical treatment for these disorders and discuss future care needs. RECENT

findingsApproximately, one quarter of all women suffer from at least one or more PFDs. Urinary incontinence represents the most common PFD with an estimated prevalence of 15-17%, whereas fecal incontinence affects, approximately, 9% of adult women. POP is more difficult to assess with prevalence estimates ranging from 3 to 8%. Surgery for PFDs is common as 20% of women undergo stress urinary incontinence or POP surgery over their lifetime. As the aging population grows, the number of women with PFDs will increase substantially and the demand for care for these disorders will continue to grow through the year 2050. SUMMARY: PFDs are a significant public health issue and they negatively impact the lives of millions of adult women. The projected increase in the number of women affected by PFDs over the next 40 years will create increased demand for providers properly trained in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansNutrition SurveysPelvic Organ ProlapsePrevalenceSeverity of Illness IndexUnited StatesUrinary IncontinenceWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID26308198
PMCPMC5081686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.