Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26308192›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Reduction in Neisseria meningitidis infection in Italy after Meningococcal C conjugate vaccine introduction: A time trend analysis of 1994-2012 series.

Chiara de Waure, Alessandro Miglietta, Darko Nedovic, Giovanna Mereu, Walter Ricciardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of hepatitis B vaccination on acute hepatitis B epidemiology in European Union/European Economic Area countries, 2006 to 2014.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Article
  7. Impact and effectiveness of meningococcal vaccines: a review.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  8. Impact of vaccination on meningococcal epidemiology.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara de Waurea Catholic University of the Sacred Heart ; Department of Public Health ; Rome , Italy.
Alessandro Migliettab Florence Local Health Authority; Preventive Health Care Unit ; Florence , Italy.
Darko Nedovicc University of Nis; Center for Biomedical Research ; Nis , Serbia.
Giovanna Mereub Florence Local Health Authority; Preventive Health Care Unit ; Florence , Italy.
Walter Ricciardia Catholic University of the Sacred Heart ; Department of Public Health ; Rome , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in Italy is among the lowest in Europe. Meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (MCC) was introduced in 2005 for 12 months old infants. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of IMD in Italy from 1994 to 2012 and to evaluate the impact of MCC introduction. Data about Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis) cases were drawn from the National Surveillance of Invasive Bacterial Diseases. The average incidence of IMD during 1994-2012 in Italy was 0.36 per 100,000 (95%CI 0.30; 0.40). N. meningitidis B was the most frequent serogroup and infants less than 12 months old were the most affected. Joinpoint analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of N. meningitidis C related IMD after MCC introduction: the Annual Percentage Change declined from 21.8 (95%CI 15.1; 28.9) in 1994-2005 to -19.9 (95%CI -28.2; -10.7) afterwards. No changes were observed with respect to N. meningitidis B related IMD. Poisson regression showed a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of IMD both associated to N. meningitidis C (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.33; 95%CI 0.29; 0.37) and due to all serogroups (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.70; 95%CI 0.65; 0.75) in the post-vaccination period compared to the pre-vaccination one. On the other hand, the incidence of N. meningitidis B related IMD did not decrease. Our results suggest that MCC had an impact in decreasing the incidence of N. meningitidis C related IMD. However, data on typing are incomplete and efforts are needed to make them available for studying the need and the impact of other meningococcal vaccines.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantItalyMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesMiddle AgedNeisseria meningitidisSerogroupVaccinationVaccines, ConjugateMeningococcal Vaccinesserogroup C meningococcal conjugate vaccineVaccines, Conjugateepidemiologymeningococcal C conjugate VaccineNeisseria meningitidissurveillancetime analysis

Identifiers

PMID26308192
PMCPMC5049743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.