Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26308086›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Accelerated Optical Projection Tomography Applied to In Vivo Imaging of Zebrafish.

Teresa Correia, Nicola Lockwood, Sunil Kumar, Jun Yin, Marie-Christine Ramel, Natalie Andrews, Matilda Katan, Laurence Bugeon, Margaret J Dallman, James McGinty and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optical projection tomography implemented for accessibility and low cost (Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebrovascular development: mechanisms and experimental approaches.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Teresa CorreiaDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola LockwoodDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom; CoMPLEX, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sunil KumarDepartment of Physics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jun YinDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marie-Christine RamelDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Life Sciences, Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Natalie AndrewsDepartment of Life Sciences, Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matilda KatanDepartment of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laurence BugeonDepartment of Life Sciences, Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Margaret J DallmanDepartment of Life Sciences, Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
James McGintyDepartment of Physics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul FrankelDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul M W FrenchDepartment of Physics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon ArridgeDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council MR/K011561/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 095931/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical projection tomography (OPT) provides a non-invasive 3-D imaging modality that can be applied to longitudinal studies of live disease models, including in zebrafish. Current limitations include the requirement of a minimum number of angular projections for reconstruction of reasonable OPT images using filtered back projection (FBP), which is typically several hundred, leading to acquisition times of several minutes. It is highly desirable to decrease the number of required angular projections to decrease both the total acquisition time and the light dose to the sample. This is particularly important to enable longitudinal studies, which involve measurements of the same fish at different time points. In this work, we demonstrate that the use of an iterative algorithm to reconstruct sparsely sampled OPT data sets can provide useful 3-D images with 50 or fewer projections, thereby significantly decreasing the minimum acquisition time and light dose while maintaining image quality. A transgenic zebrafish embryo with fluorescent labelling of the vasculature was imaged to acquire densely sampled (800 projections) and under-sampled data sets of transmitted and fluorescence projection images. The under-sampled OPT data sets were reconstructed using an iterative total variation-based image reconstruction algorithm and compared against FBP reconstructions of the densely sampled data sets. To illustrate the potential for quantitative analysis following rapid OPT data acquisition, a Hessian-based method was applied to automatically segment the reconstructed images to select the vasculature network. Results showed that 3-D images of the zebrafish embryo and its vasculature of sufficient visual quality for quantitative analysis can be reconstructed using the iterative algorithm from only 32 projections-achieving up to 28 times improvement in imaging speed and leading to total acquisition times of a few seconds.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorescenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLightStaining and LabelingTomography, OpticalZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26308086
PMCPMC4550250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.