Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26308047›Full record

ArticleNutrients2015

A Comparison of the Sodium Content of Supermarket Private-Label and Branded Foods in Australia.

Helen Trevena, Bruce Neal, Elizabeth Dunford, Hila Haskelberg, Jason H Y Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contribution of major food companies and their products to household dietary sodium purchases in Australia.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Science of Salt: A global review on changes in sodium levels in foods.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Examination of food industry progress in reducing the sodium content of packaged foods in Canada: 2010 to 2013.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Helen TrevenaThe George Institute for Global Health, The School of Public Health, University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201 Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. htrevena@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, The School of Public Health, University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201 Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. bneal@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Elizabeth DunfordThe George Institute for Global Health, The School of Public Health, University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201 Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. edunford@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Hila HaskelbergThe George Institute for Global Health, The School of Public Health, University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201 Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. hhaskelberg@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Jason H Y WuThe George Institute for Global Health, The School of Public Health, University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201 Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. jwu1@georgeinstitute.org.au.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supermarket private-label products are perceived to be lower quality than their branded counterparts. Excess dietary sodium in foods contributes to high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Sodium concentrations in products are an important indicator of quality. We compared the sodium content of 15,680 supermarket private-label and branded products, available in four Australian supermarkets between 2011-2013, overall and for 15 food categories. Mean sodium values were compared for: (1) all products in 2013; (2) products in both 2011 and 2013; and (3) products only in 2013. Comparisons were made using paired and unpaired t tests. In each year the proportion of supermarket private-label products was 31%-32%, with overall mean sodium content 17% (12%-23%) lower than branded products in 2013 (p ≤ 0.001). For products available in both 2011 and 2013 there was a ≤2% (1%-3%) mean sodium reduction overall with no difference in reformulation between supermarket private-label and branded products (p = 0.73). New supermarket private-label products in 2013 were 11% lower in sodium than their branded counterparts (p = 0.02). Supermarket private-label products performed generally better than branded in terms of their sodium content. Lower sodium intake translates into lower blood pressure; some supermarket private-label products may be a good option for Australians needing to limit their sodium intake.

Indexed as

Food LabelingAustraliaFood AnalysisFood HandlingSodium, DietarySodium, Dietarybrandedpre-packaged foodprivate-labelsodium reduction

Identifiers

PMID26308047
PMCPMC4555160
OpenAlexW2152385234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.