Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26307978›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Atherosclerotic Calcification Detection: A Comparative Study of Carotid Ultrasound and Cone Beam CT.

Fisnik Jashari, Pranvera Ibrahimi, Elias Johansson, Jan Ahlqvist, Conny Arnerlöv, Maria Garoff, Eva Levring Jäghagen, Per Wester, Michael Y Henein

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [A comparative study of color Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography for preoperative evaluation of perforator vessels in free posterior interosseous artery flap].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fisnik JashariDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. fisnik.jashari@medicin.umu.se.
Pranvera IbrahimiDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. pranvera.ibrahimi@medicin.umu.se.
Elias JohanssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. elias.johansson@umu.se.
Jan AhlqvistDepartment of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. jan.ahlqvist@umu.se.
Conny ArnerlövDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. conny.arnerlov@vll.se.
Maria GaroffDepartment of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. maria.garoff@umu.se.
Eva Levring JäghagenDepartment of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. eva.levring.jaghagen@umu.se.
Per WesterDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. per.wester@medicin.umu.se.
Michael Y HeneinDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. michael.henein@medicin.umu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimArterial calcification is often detected on ultrasound examination but its diagnostic accuracy is not well validated. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of carotid ultrasound B mode findings in detecting atherosclerotic calcification quantified by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

methodsWe analyzed 94 carotid arteries, from 88 patients (mean age 70 ± 7 years, 33% females), who underwent pre-endarterectomy ultrasound examination. Plaques with high echogenic nodules and posterior shadowing were considered calcified. After surgery, the excised plaques were examined using CBCT, from which the calcification volume (mm3) was calculated. In cases with multiple calcifications the largest calcification nodule volume was used to represent the plaque. Carotid artery calcification by the two imaging techniques was compared using conventional correlations.

resultsCarotid ultrasound was highly accurate in detecting the presence of calcification; with a sensitivity of 88.2%. Based on the quartile ranges of calcification volumes measured by CBCT we have divided plaque calcification into four groups: <8; 8-35; 36-70 and >70 mm3. Calcification volumes ≥8 were accurately detectable by ultrasound with a sensitivity of 96%. Of the 21 plaques with <8 mm3 calcification volume; only 13 were detected by ultrasound; resulting in a sensitivity of 62%. There was no difference in the volume of calcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

conclusionCarotid ultrasound is highly accurate in detecting the presence of calcified atherosclerotic lesions of volume ≥8 mm3; but less accurate in detecting smaller volume calcified plaques. Further development of ultrasound techniques should allow better detection of early arterial calcification.

Indexed as

AgedCarotid ArteriesCarotid Artery DiseasesCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographycalcificationcarotid atherosclerosisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID26307978
PMCPMC4581335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.