ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is restoration of vertebral body height after vertebral body fractures and minimally-invasive dorsal stabilization with polyaxial pedicle screws just an illusion?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Effect of changing the acquisition trajectory of the 3D C-arm (CBCT) on image quality in spine surgery: experimental study using an artificial bone model.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Spinal cord injury in the setting of traumatic thoracolumbar fracture is not reliably associated with increased risk of associated intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma: An analysis of a National Trauma Registry database.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2021Article
- Effect of pedicle screw augmentation with a self-curing elastomeric material under cranio-caudal cyclic loading-a cadaveric biomechanical study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Article
- [Spinal fractures].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine result from high velocity trauma, assuming bone density is normal. The main location of fractures is the thoracolumbar junction. Most injuries can be treated conservatively; however, patients transferred to hospitals and spine centers represent a preselection with more severe trauma and a higher incidence of operative treatment. There is a large variety of operative techniques that can be used, which can be principally differentiated by the approach: posterior or anterior. Dorsal approaches are differentiated by the instrumentation for spondylodesis as open or percutaneous techniques. Minimally invasive options are favored more and more. For osteoporotic bone, cement augmented solutions may be used. Correct reduction of mainly kyphotic malalignment is crucial for the long-term outcome. Biomechanically stable reconstruction of the anterior spinal column is important mainly for the thoracolumbar junction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.