Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26307622›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Pre-exposure and postexposure prophylaxes and the combination HIV prevention methods (The Combine! Study): protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial at public healthcare clinics in Brazil.

Alexandre Grangeiro, Márcia Thereza Couto, Maria Fernanda Peres, Olinda Luiz, Eliana Miura Zucchi, Euclides Ayres de Castilho, Denize Lotufo Estevam, Rosa Alencar, Karina Wolffenbüttel, Maria Mercedes Escuder and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre GrangeiroDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Márcia Thereza CoutoDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda PeresDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olinda LuizDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliana Miura ZucchiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Católica de Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Euclides Ayres de CastilhoDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denize Lotufo EstevamCentro de Referência e Treinamento em DST/Aids, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosa AlencarCentro de Referência e Treinamento em DST/Aids, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Karina WolffenbüttelCentro de Referência e Treinamento em DST/Aids, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Mercedes EscuderInstituto de Saúde, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriela CalazansDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dulce FerrazDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Escola FIOCRUZ de Governo, Diretoria Regional de Brasília, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasília, Brazil.
Érico ArrudaHospital São José, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Maria da Gloria CorrêaServiço de Atendimento Especializado de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis e Aids da Vila dos Comerciários, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fabiana Rezende AmaralCentro de Referência em Especialidades Central, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Juliane Cardoso Villela SantosCentro de Orientação e Aconselhamento, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Curitiba, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Vivian Salles AlvarezDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tiago KietzmannDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRSecretaria da Saúde · BRSecretaria Municipal de Saúde · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRInstituto de Saúde · BRPrefeitura Municipal de Curitiba · BRUniversidade Católica de Santos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew results from programmes based on combination prevention methods are available. We propose to analyse the degree of protection provided by postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for consensual sexual activity at healthcare clinics, its compensatory effects on sexual behaviour; and the effectiveness of combination prevention methods and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), compared with exclusively using traditional methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 3200 individuals aged 16 years or older presenting for PEP at 5 sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV clinics in 3 regions of Brazil will be allocated to one of two groups: the PEP group-individuals who come to the clinic within 72 h after a sexual exposure and start PEP; and the non-PEP group-individuals who come after 72 h but within 30 days of exposure and do not start PEP. Clinical follow-up will be conducted initially for 6 months and comprise educational interventions based on information and counselling for using prevention methods, including PrEP. In the second study phase, individuals who remain HIV negative will be regrouped according to the reported use of prevention methods and observed for 18 months: only traditional methods; combined methods; and PrEP. Effectiveness will be analysed according to the incidence of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B and C and protected sexual behaviour. A structured questionnaire will be administered to participants at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Qualitative methods will be employed to provide a comprehensive understanding of PEP-seeking behaviour, preventive choices and exposure to HIV. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted in accordance with the resolution of the School of Medicine Research Ethics Commission of Universidade de São Paulo (protocol no. 251/14). The databases will be available for specific studies, after management committee approval. Findings will be presented to researchers, health managers and civil society members by means of newspapers, electronic media and scientific journals and meetings.

Indexed as

Post-Exposure ProphylaxisPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdolescentAnti-HIV AgentsBrazilFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicSexual BehaviorAnti-HIV AgentsBrazilcombination HIV preventionHIVPost-Exposure ProphylaxisPre-Exposure Prophylaxisprevention and control

Identifiers

PMID26307622
PMCPMC4550731
OpenAlexW2118065800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.