ArticleDiabetes care2015
Potential Impact of Prescribing Metformin According to eGFR Rather Than Serum Creatinine.
Article in Diabetes care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes of Metformin Use in Populations With Chronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Estimated GFR Accuracy When Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimates Are Discrepant in Older Adults.Kidney medicine · 2023Article
- The Current and Potential Therapeutic Use of Metformin-The Good Old Drug.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The FDA Metformin Label Change and Racial and Sex Disparities in Metformin Prescription among Patients with CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2020Article
- Improving Equity in Medication Use through Better Kidney Function Measurement.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2020Article
- Changes in metformin use and other antihyperglycemic therapies after insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2018Article
- Article
- Citizen Petition to the US Food and Drug Administration to Change Prescribing Guidelines: The Metformin Experience.Circulation · 2016Article
- Use of cystatin C to inform metformin eligibility among adult veterans with diabetes.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2016Article
- Diabetes: Metformin and renal insufficiency-is 45, or even 30, the new 60?Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMany societies recommend using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than serum creatinine (sCr) to determine metformin eligibility. We examined the potential impact of these recommendations on metformin eligibility among U.S. adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsMetformin eligibility was assessed among 3,902 adults with diabetes who participated in the 1999-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys and reported routine access to health care, using conventional sCr thresholds (eligible if <1.4 mg/dL for women and <1.5 mg/dL for men) and eGFR categories: likely safe, ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m(2); contraindicated, <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2); and indeterminate, 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Different eGFR equations were used: four-variable MDRD, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine (CKD-EPIcr), and CKD-EPI cystatin C, as well as Cockcroft-Gault (CG) to estimate creatinine clearance (CrCl). Diabetes was defined by self-report or A1C ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). We used logistic regression to identify populations for whom metformin was likely safe adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Results were weighted to the U.S. adult population.
resultsAmong adults with sCr above conventional cutoffs, MDRD eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was most common among men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 33.3 [95% CI 7.4-151.5] vs. women) and non-Hispanic Blacks (aOR vs. whites 14.8 [4.27-51.7]). No individuals with sCr below conventional cutoffs had an MDRD eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). All estimating equations expanded the population of individuals for whom metformin is likely safe, ranging from 86,900 (CKD-EPIcr) to 834,800 (CG). All equations identified larger populations with eGFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2), for whom metformin safety is indeterminate, ranging from 784,700 (CKD-EPIcr) to 1,636,000 (CG).
conclusionsThe use of eGFR or CrCl to determine metformin eligibility instead of sCr can expand the adult population with diabetes for whom metformin is likely safe, particularly among non-Hispanic blacks and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.