Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26307543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Sandcastle: software for revealing latent information in multiple experimental ChIP-chip datasets via a novel normalisation procedure.

Mark Bennett, Katie Ellen Evans, Shirong Yu, Yumin Teng, Richard M Webster, James Powell, Raymond Waters, Simon H Reed

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark BennettCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Katie Ellen EvansCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Shirong YuCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Yumin TengCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Richard M WebsterCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
James PowellCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Raymond WatersCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Simon H ReedCancer and Genetics Building, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400113Medical Research Council MR/K000926/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ChIP-chip is a microarray based technology for determining the genomic locations of chromatin bound factors of interest, such as proteins. Standard ChIP-chip analyses employ peak detection methodologies to generate lists of genomic binding sites. No previously published method exists to enable comparative analyses of enrichment levels derived from datasets examining different experimental conditions. This restricts the use of the technology to binary comparisons of presence or absence of features between datasets. Here we present the R package Sandcastle — Software for the Analysis and Normalisation of Data from ChIP-chip AssayS of Two or more Linked Experiments — which allows for comparative analyses of data from multiple experiments by normalising all datasets to a common background. Relative changes in binding levels between experimental datasets can thus be determined, enabling the extraction of latent information from ChIP-chip experiments. Novel enrichment detection and peak calling algorithms are also presented, with a range of graphical tools, which facilitate these analyses. The software and documentation are available for download from http://reedlab.cardiff.ac.uk/sandcastle.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticData Interpretation, StatisticalSoftwareAlgorithmsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputer SimulationData MiningHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, StatisticalPattern Recognition, AutomatedProgramming LanguagesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26307543
PMCPMC4549617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.