ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2015
Assessing Electronic Cigarette-Related Tweets for Sentiment and Content Using Supervised Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methods for Coding Tobacco-Related Twitter Data: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- AI for Tobacco Control: Identifying Tobacco-Promoting Social Media Content Using Large Language Models.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- A Comparison of ChatGPT and Fine-Tuned Open Pre-Trained Transformers (OPT) Against Widely Used Sentiment Analysis Tools: Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Survey Data.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Scanned information exposure and support for tobacco regulations among US youth and young adult tobacco product users and non-users.Health education research · 2023Article
- Cervical Myelopathy and Social Media: Mixed Methods Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Text mining tweets on e-cigarette risks and benefits using machine learning following a vaping related lung injury outbreak in the USA.Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Classification of Twitter Vaping Discourse Using BERTweet: Comparative Deep Learning Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Hospital Facebook Reviews Analysis Using a Machine Learning Sentiment Analyzer and Quality Classifier.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Characterizing Vaping Industry Political Influence and Mobilization on Facebook: Social Network Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Digital Surveillance to Identify California Alternative and Emerging Tobacco Industry Policy Influence and Mobilization on Facebook.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Quality of Care Evaluation in Malaysia Using SERVQUAL and Facebook.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Assessing Patient-Perceived Hospital Service Quality and Sentiment in Malaysian Public Hospitals Using Machine Learning and Facebook Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Analyzing Twitter Data to Evaluate People's Attitudes towards Public Health Policies and Events in the Era of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Rating the Valence of Media Content about Electronic Cigarettes Using Crowdsourcing: Testing Rater Instructions and Estimating the Optimal Number of Raters.Health communication · 2021Article
- Social Media as a Research Tool (SMaaRT) for Risky Behavior Analytics: Methodological Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2020Review
- Public Opinion About E-Cigarettes on Chinese Social Media: A Combined Study of Text Mining Analysis and Correspondence Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Valence of Media Coverage About Electronic Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products From 2014 to 2017: Evidence From Automated Content Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020Article
- Machine Learning Classifiers for Twitter Surveillance of Vaping: Comparative Machine Learning Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Understanding Discussions of Health Issues on Twitter: A Visual Analytic Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) continue to be a growing topic among social media users, especially on Twitter. The ability to analyze conversations about e-cigarettes in real-time can provide important insight into trends in the public's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs surrounding e-cigarettes, and subsequently guide public health interventions.
objectiveOur aim was to establish a supervised machine learning algorithm to build predictive classification models that assess Twitter data for a range of factors related to e-cigarettes.
methodsManual content analysis was conducted for 17,098 tweets. These tweets were coded for five categories: e-cigarette relevance, sentiment, user description, genre, and theme. Machine learning classification models were then built for each of these five categories, and word groupings (n-grams) were used to define the feature space for each classifier.
resultsPredictive performance scores for classification models indicated that the models correctly labeled the tweets with the appropriate variables between 68.40% and 99.34% of the time, and the percentage of maximum possible improvement over a random baseline that was achieved by the classification models ranged from 41.59% to 80.62%. Classifiers with the highest performance scores that also achieved the highest percentage of the maximum possible improvement over a random baseline were Policy/Government (performance: 0.94; % improvement: 80.62%), Relevance (performance: 0.94; % improvement: 75.26%), Ad or Promotion (performance: 0.89; % improvement: 72.69%), and Marketing (performance: 0.91; % improvement: 72.56%). The most appropriate word-grouping unit (n-gram) was 1 for the majority of classifiers. Performance continued to marginally increase with the size of the training dataset of manually annotated data, but eventually leveled off. Even at low dataset sizes of 4000 observations, performance characteristics were fairly sound.
conclusionsSocial media outlets like Twitter can uncover real-time snapshots of personal sentiment, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior that are not as accessible, at this scale, through any other offline platform. Using the vast data available through social media presents an opportunity for social science and public health methodologies to utilize computational methodologies to enhance and extend research and practice. This study was successful in automating a complex five-category manual content analysis of e-cigarette-related content on Twitter using machine learning techniques. The study details machine learning model specifications that provided the best accuracy for data related to e-cigarettes, as well as a replicable methodology to allow extension of these methods to additional topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.