Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26307407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

TRIM32 modulates pluripotency entry and exit by directly regulating Oct4 stability.

Lamia'a Bahnassawy, Thanneer M Perumal, Laura Gonzalez-Cano, Anna-Lena Hillje, Leila Taher, Wojciech Makalowski, Yutaka Suzuki, Georg Fuellen, Antonio del Sol, Jens Christian Schwamborn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lamia'a BahnassawyWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, ZMBE, Institute of Cell Biology, Stem Cell Biology and Regeneration Group, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Thanneer M PerumalLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), Computational Biology, University of Luxembourg, 7 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-Belval, Luxembourg.
Laura Gonzalez-CanoLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), Developmental and Cellular Biology, University of Luxembourg, 7 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-Belval, Luxembourg.
Anna-Lena HilljeLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), Developmental and Cellular Biology, University of Luxembourg, 7 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-Belval, Luxembourg.
Leila TaherInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine und Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Centre, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 8, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Wojciech MakalowskiWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institute of Bioinformatics, Niels-Stensen-Straße 14, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Yutaka SuzukiDepartment of Medical Genome Sciences, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken 227-8561, Japan.
Georg FuellenInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine und Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Centre, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 8, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Antonio del SolLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), Computational Biology, University of Luxembourg, 7 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-Belval, Luxembourg.
Jens Christian SchwambornWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, ZMBE, Institute of Cell Biology, Stem Cell Biology and Regeneration Group, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, 48149 Münster, Germany.
University of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have revolutionized the world of regenerative medicine; nevertheless, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying their generation and differentiation remain elusive. Here, we investigated the role of the cell fate determinant TRIM32 in modulating such processes. TRIM32 is essential for the induction of neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells by poly-ubiquitinating cMyc to target it for degradation resulting in inhibition of cell proliferation. To elucidate the role of TRIM32 in regulating somatic cell reprogramming we analysed the capacity of TRIM32-knock-out mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in generating iPSC colonies. TRIM32 knock-out MEFs produced a higher number of iPSC colonies indicating a role for TRIM32 in inhibiting this cellular transition. Further characterization of the generated iPSCs indicated that the TRIM32 knock-out iPSCs show perturbed differentiation kinetics. Additionally, mathematical modelling of global gene expression data revealed that during differentiation an Oct4 centred network in the wild-type cells is replaced by an E2F1 centred network in the TRIM32 deficient cells. We show here that this might be caused by a TRIM32-dependent downregulation of Oct4. In summary, the data presented here reveal that TRIM32 directly regulates at least two of the four Yamanaka Factors (cMyc and Oct4), to modulate cell fate transitions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedFibroblastsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pluripotent Stem CellsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanTRIM32 protein, mouseUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID26307407
PMCPMC4642535
OpenAlexW2155920192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.