Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26307129›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2015

Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

John A Spertus, Philip G Jones

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 293 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
293citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03238729 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Proof-of-Concept Study of a Smartphone Application Created to Improve Management of Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure: the Heart Failure Heart Habits Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorJana CareRan2017 to 2018Enrolled28ConditionsHeart FailureArmsHeart Failure Education and Management App, Heart Failure Literature
NCT03517514 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Investigating All-Cause 30-Day Hospital Readmisisons in Patients Discharged From a Tertiary Teaching Hospital With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diagnosis

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRan2018 to 2019Enrolled102ConditionsAcute Heart FailureArmsPhysical Therapy service
NCT04752462 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Post-Discharge Telemedicine Motivational Enhancement Intervention in Heart Failure and Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Adherence and Health Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2021 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsAcute Decompensated Heart Failure, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Motivational Enhancement, PAP AdherenceArmsTelemedicine Intensive Motivational Enhancement
NCT06994325 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial for the Conversations Helpful for Awareness of Illness Trajectory (CHAT) Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsHFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionArmsConversations Helpful for Awareness of Illness Trajectory (CHAT) Intervention, Standard of Care (SOC)
NCT07184541 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Nurse-led Daily Weight Monitoring Intervention (Wake and Weigh) on Heart Failure Quality of Life and Self-care

TypeinterventionalSponsorLee Anne SiegmundRan2024 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsHeart FailureArmsWake and Weigh, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

293 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

233 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John A Spertus
Philip G Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing demand to collect patients' experiences of their health status (their symptoms, function, and quality of life) in clinical trials, quality assessment initiatives, and in routine clinical care. In heart failure, the 23-item, disease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been shown to be valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and prognostic of both clinical events and costs. However, its use has been limited, in part, by its length. We sought to develop a shortened version of the instrument that maintains the psychometric properties of the full KCCQ. METHODS AND

resultsUsing data from 3 clinical studies incorporating 4168 patients, we derived and validated a 12-item KCCQ, the KCCQ-12, to capture symptom frequency, physical and social limitations, and quality of life impairment as a result of heart failure, as well as an overall summary score. The KCCQ-12 scores had high correlations with the original scales (>0.93 for all scales in all clinical settings), high test–retest reliability (>0.76 for all domains), high responsiveness (16–31 point improvements after discharge from hospitalization; standardized response mean =0.61–1.12), and comparable prognostic significance and interpretation of clinically important differences as compared with the full KCCQ.

conclusionsThe KCCQ-12 is a shorter version of the original 23-item instrument that should be more feasible to implement while preserving the psychometric properties of the full instrument.

Indexed as

Health StatusCardiomyopathiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansKansasPrognosisPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26307129
PMCPMC4885562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.