Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26307095›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

The Escherichia coli NarL receiver domain regulates transcription through promoter specific functions.

Galit Katsir, Michael Jarvis, Martin Phillips, Zhongcai Ma, Robert P Gunsalus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Real-time detection of response regulator phosphorylation dynamics in live bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Galit KatsirDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Michael JarvisDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Martin PhillipsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Zhongcai MaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Robert P GunsalusDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. robg@microbio.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USAmbry Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/INTERACTIONS OF DNA COMPLEXES WITH ANTITUMOR DRUGS AND PROTEINSP01GM031299 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YEATES, TODD O · 1985 to 2005
$7.6M
ANAEROBIC EXPRESSION OF FUMARATE REDUCTASE IN E. COLIR01AI021678 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GUNSALUS, ROBERT P · 1986 to 2008
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI21678NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI021678NIGMS NIH HHS GM31299NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM031299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Escherichia coli response regulator NarL controls transcription of genes involved in nitrate respiration during anaerobiosis. NarL consists of two domains joined by a linker that wraps around the interdomain interface. Phosphorylation of the NarL N-terminal receiver domain (RD) releases the, otherwise sequestered, C-terminal output domain (OD) that subsequently binds specific DNA promoter sites to repress or activate gene expression. The aim of this study is to investigate the extent to which the NarL OD and RD function independently to regulate transcription, and the affect of the linker on OD function.

resultsNarL OD constructs containing different linker segments were examined for their ability to repress frdA-lacZ or activate narG-lacZ reporter fusion genes. These in vivo expression assays revealed that the NarL OD, in the absence or presence of linker helix α6, constitutively repressed frdA-lacZ expression regardless of nitrate availability. However, the presence of the linker loop α5-α6 reversed this repression and also showed impaired DNA binding in vitro. The OD alone could not activate narG-lacZ expression; this activity required the presence of the NarL RD. A footprint assay demonstrated that the NarL OD only partially bound recognition sites at the narG promoter, and the binding affinity was increased by the presence of the phosphorylated RD. Analytical ultracentrifugation used to examine domain oligomerization showed that the NarL RD forms dimers in solution while the OD is monomeric.

conclusionsThe NarL RD operates as an on-off switch to occlude or release the OD in a nitrate-responsive manner, but has additional roles to directly stimulate transcription at promoters for which the OD lacks independent function. One such role of the RD is to enhance the DNA binding affinity of the OD to target promoter sites. The data also imply that NarL phosphorylation results in RD dimerization and in the separation of the entire linker region from the OD.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnaerobiosisArtificial Gene Fusionbeta-GalactosidaseDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenes, ReporterNitratesOxidation-Reductionbeta-GalactosidaseDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsNarL protein, E coliNitrates

Identifiers

PMID26307095
PMCPMC4549865
OpenAlexW2161801721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.