Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26306781›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2016

Comprehension of Fish Consumption Guidelines Among Older Male Anglers in Wisconsin.

Krista Y Christensen, Michelle R Raymond, Brooke A Thompson, Candy S Schrank, Meghan C W Williams, Henry A Anderson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Krista Y ChristensenWisconsin Division of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, 1 West Wilson Street, Room 145, Madison, WI, 53703, USA. Krista.Christensen@wisconsin.gov.
Michelle R RaymondWisconsin Division of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, 1 West Wilson Street, Room 145, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.
Brooke A ThompsonWisconsin Division of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, 1 West Wilson Street, Room 145, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.
Candy S SchrankWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 101 South Webster Street, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Meghan C W WilliamsWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 101 South Webster Street, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Henry A AndersonWisconsin Division of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, 1 West Wilson Street, Room 145, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services · USWisconsin Department of Natural Resources · USWisconsin Division of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although awareness of Wisconsin's fish consumption guidelines is high among older male anglers, little is known about comprehension of guideline content, and many anglers have levels of contaminants high enough to be associated with adverse health outcomes. The Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Restoration Initiative supported evaluation and revision of Wisconsin's fish consumption guideline program, using a web based survey of male Wisconsin anglers over the age of 50. A total of 3740 men completed the online survey; the median age of respondents was 62 years, and nearly all had lived and fished in Wisconsin for over 10 years. Comprehension of guideline content was relatively high, although two knowledge gaps were identified, one relating to mercury exposures and fish preparation, and the other to polychlorinated biphenyl content of certain fish species. The fishing regulations booklet distributed with annual fishing licenses and warning signs posted at fishing locations were commonly reported sources of guideline information in Wisconsin. Residents of coastal counties and consumers of Great Lakes fish were more likely to report guideline knowledge and behavior changes reflective of guideline knowledge, when compared to inland residents and those not consuming Great Lakes fish, respectively. In general, Wisconsin's consumption guidelines do not appear to discourage men from eating the fish they catch; rather, the most common behavioral changes included modifying the species eaten or the water body source of their meals. Continued efforts to educate anglers about the risks and benefits of fish consumption are needed.

Indexed as

DietFishesGuidelines as TopicLeisure ActivitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAwarenessGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMercuryMiddle AgedPolychlorinated BiphenylsSocioeconomic FactorsWisconsinMercuryPolychlorinated BiphenylsAdvisoryAnglersComprehensionFish

Identifiers

PMID26306781
OpenAlexW1170742255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.