ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016
Harmonising and linking biomedical and clinical data across disparate data archives to enable integrative cross-biobank research.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Data Harmonization in Clinical Research: Natural Language Processing Approach.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Optimizing data linkage for maximizing the potential of Luxembourg's national cancer registry: a comprehensive scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- National strategies for screening neural tube defects in Saudi Arabia: activating prevention and early intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Standardizing digital biobanks: integrating imaging, genomic, and clinical data for precision medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- An ethical code for collecting, using and transferring sensitive health data: outcomes of a modified Policy Delphi process in Singapore.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- HUNT for better public health.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Identifying Datasets for Cross-Study Analysis in dbGaP using PhenX.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Assessing the Need for Semantic Data Integration for Surgical Biobanks-A Knowledge Representation Perspective.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- BioSCOOP - Biobank Sample Communication Protocol. New approach for the transfer of information between biobanks.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research.PloS one · 2019Article
- Rationale and design of a placebo controlled randomized trial to assess short term, high-dose oral cholecalciferol on select laboratory and genomic responses in African Americans with hypovitaminosis D.Contemporary clinical trials · 2018Article
- Genome Database of the Latvian Population (LGDB): Design, Goals, and Primary Results.Journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- MIRACUM: Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine.Methods of information in medicine · 2018Article
- E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- OBIB-a novel ontology for biobanking.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wealth of biospecimen samples are stored in modern globally distributed biobanks. Biomedical researchers worldwide need to be able to combine the available resources to improve the power of large-scale studies. A prerequisite for this effort is to be able to search and access phenotypic, clinical and other information about samples that are currently stored at biobanks in an integrated manner. However, privacy issues together with heterogeneous information systems and the lack of agreed-upon vocabularies have made specimen searching across multiple biobanks extremely challenging. We describe three case studies where we have linked samples and sample descriptions in order to facilitate global searching of available samples for research. The use cases include the ENGAGE (European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology) consortium comprising at least 39 cohorts, the SUMMIT (surrogate markers for micro- and macro-vascular hard endpoints for innovative diabetes tools) consortium and a pilot for data integration between a Swedish clinical health registry and a biobank. We used the Sample avAILability (SAIL) method for data linking: first, created harmonised variables and then annotated and made searchable information on the number of specimens available in individual biobanks for various phenotypic categories. By operating on this categorised availability data we sidestep many obstacles related to privacy that arise when handling real values and show that harmonised and annotated records about data availability across disparate biomedical archives provide a key methodological advance in pre-analysis exchange of information between biobanks, that is, during the project planning phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.