Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26306643›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Harmonising and linking biomedical and clinical data across disparate data archives to enable integrative cross-biobank research.

Ola Spjuth, Maria Krestyaninova, Janna Hastings, Huei-Yi Shen, Jani Heikkinen, Melanie Waldenberger, Arnulf Langhammer, Claes Ladenvall, Tõnu Esko, Mats-Åke Persson and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HUNT for better public health.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  15. OBIB-a novel ontology for biobanking.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Ola SpjuthDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria KrestyaninovaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Janna HastingsEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Huei-Yi ShenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum Helsinki 2U, Helsinki, Finland.
Jani HeikkinenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum Helsinki 2U, Helsinki, Finland.
Melanie WaldenbergerInstitute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Arnulf LanghammerDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway.
Claes LadenvallDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tõnu EskoEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mats-Åke PerssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jon HegglandDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway.
Joern DietrichEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Sandra OseEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Christian GiegerInstitute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Janina S RiedInstitute of Genetic Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Neuherberg.
Annette PetersInstitute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Isabel FortierMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eco J C de GeusDepartment of Biological Psychology, FGB, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Janis KlovinsLatvian Genome Data Base (LGDB), Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites 1 k-1, Riga, Latvia.
Linda ZaharenkoLatvian Genome Data Base (LGDB), Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites 1 k-1, Riga, Latvia.
Gonneke WillemsenDepartment of Biological Psychology, FGB, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jouke-Jan HottengaDepartment of Biological Psychology, FGB, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Eric LittonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Juha KarvanenNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Dorret I BoomsmaDepartment of Biological Psychology, FGB, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leif GroopInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum Helsinki 2U, Helsinki, Finland.
Johan RungEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Juni PalmgrenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nancy L PedersenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mark I McCarthyOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Cornelia M van DuijnDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kristian HveemDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway.
Andres MetspaluEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Samuli RipattiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum Helsinki 2U, Helsinki, Finland.
Inga ProkopenkoOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Jennifer R HarrisDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Genes and Environment, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wealth of biospecimen samples are stored in modern globally distributed biobanks. Biomedical researchers worldwide need to be able to combine the available resources to improve the power of large-scale studies. A prerequisite for this effort is to be able to search and access phenotypic, clinical and other information about samples that are currently stored at biobanks in an integrated manner. However, privacy issues together with heterogeneous information systems and the lack of agreed-upon vocabularies have made specimen searching across multiple biobanks extremely challenging. We describe three case studies where we have linked samples and sample descriptions in order to facilitate global searching of available samples for research. The use cases include the ENGAGE (European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology) consortium comprising at least 39 cohorts, the SUMMIT (surrogate markers for micro- and macro-vascular hard endpoints for innovative diabetes tools) consortium and a pilot for data integration between a Swedish clinical health registry and a biobank. We used the Sample avAILability (SAIL) method for data linking: first, created harmonised variables and then annotated and made searchable information on the number of specimens available in individual biobanks for various phenotypic categories. By operating on this categorised availability data we sidestep many obstacles related to privacy that arise when handling real values and show that harmonised and annotated records about data availability across disparate biomedical archives provide a key methodological advance in pre-analysis exchange of information between biobanks, that is, during the project planning phase.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksDatabases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID26306643
PMCPMC4929882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.