ArticleBMC neurology2015
Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Article in BMC neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- AAV gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the EMBARK phase 3 randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Viltolarsen in Japanese Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients: A phase 1/2 study.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020Trial
- A Registry-Based Perspective of Interventional Clinical Trials for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Cureus · 2026Article
- Gene Editing Strategies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Cells · 2026Review
- Developing a Natural History Model for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Beneficial immune-modulatory effects of the N-163 strain ofIBRO neuroscience reports · 2023Article
- Circadian Genes as Exploratory Biomarkers in DMD: Results From Both theFrontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Marked motor function improvement in a 32-year-old woman with childhood-onset hypophosphatasia by asfotase alfa therapy: Evaluation based on standardized testing batteries used in Duchenne muscular dystrophy clinical trials.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2020Article
- Stem cell therapy for muscular dystrophies.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Review
- A high-throughput digital script for multiplexed immunofluorescent analysis and quantification of sarcolemmal and sarcomeric proteins in muscular dystrophies.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2020Article
- Peptide-conjugate antisense based splice-correction for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other neuromuscular diseases.EBioMedicine · 2019Review
- Next-generation muscle-directed gene therapy by in silico vector design.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Multiple Exon Skipping in the Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Hot Spots: Prospects and Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2018Review
- Patient reported outcomes in GNE myopathy: incorporating a valid assessment of physical function in a rare disease.Disability and rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Mitochondrial disease patient motivations and barriers to participate in clinical trials.PloS one · 2018Article
- Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies: A Review of Animal Models, Clinical End Points, and Biomarker Quantification.Toxicologic pathology · 2017Review
- Oligonucleotide therapies for disorders of the nervous system.Nature biotechnology · 2017Article
- Non-invasive evaluation of muscle disease in the canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy by electrical impedance myography.PloS one · 2017Article
- Gene Editing for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using the CRISPR/Cas9 Technology: The Importance of Fine-tuning the Approach.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2016Article
- Current and emerging treatment strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, the most promising therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are exon skipping and stop codon read-through, two strategies aimed at restoring the expression of dystrophin. A phase 3 clinical trial with drisapersen, a drug designed to induce exon 51-skipping, has failed to show significant improvement of the primary outcome measure, the six-minute walk test. DISCUSSION: Here, we review some key points that should be considered when designing clinical trials for these new therapies. First, younger patients have more functional abilities and more muscle fibers to preserve than older patients and therefore are better subjects for trials designed to demonstrate the success of new treatments. Second, the inclusion of patients on corticosteroids both in the treatment and placebo groups is of concern because the positive effect of corticosteroids might mask the effect of the treatment being tested. Additionally, the reasonable expectation from these therapies is the slowing of disease progression rather than improvement. Therefore, the appropriate clinical endpoints are the prolongation of the ability to stand from the floor, climb stairs, and walk, not an increase in muscle strength or function. Hence, the time frames for the detection of new dystrophin, which occurs within months, and the ability to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression, which requires years, are strikingly different. Finally, placebo-controlled trials are difficult to manage if years of blindness are required to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression. Thus, accelerated/conditional approval for new therapies should be based on surrogate biochemical outcomes: the demonstration of de novo dystrophin production and of its beneficial effect on the functional recovery of muscle fiber. These data suggest that clinical trials for DMD patients must be adapted to the particular characteristics of the disease in order to demonstrate the expected positive effect of new treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.