Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26306522›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Presentation patterns and outcomes of patients with cancer accessing care in emergency departments in Victoria, Australia.

Dania M van der Meer, Tracey J Weiland, Jennifer Philip, George A Jelinek, Mark Boughey, Jonathan Knott, Claudia H Marck, Jennifer L Weil, Heather P Lane, Anthony J Dowling and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evaluating a shared care pathway intervention for people receiving chemotherapy to reduce post-treatment unplanned hospital presentations: a randomised controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  4. Telehealth service use in people with cancer compared to people without cancer: analysis of Patient Experience Surveys in Australia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantifying the hospital and emergency department costs for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Emergency department visits among people with cancer: Frequency, symptoms, and characteristics.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dania M van der MeerEmergency Practice Innovation Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Tracey J WeilandEmergency Practice Innovation Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Jennifer PhilipPalliative Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
George A JelinekEmergency Practice Innovation Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia. george.jelinek@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-0910
Mark BougheyPalliative Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan KnottEmergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Claudia H MarckEmergency Practice Innovation Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Jennifer L WeilPalliative Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Heather P LanePalliative Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anthony J DowlingDepartment of Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anne-Maree KellyJoseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research at Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
St. Vincent's Birmingham · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUWestern Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople with cancer attend emergency departments (EDs) for many reasons. Improved understanding of the specific needs of these patients may assist in optimizing health service delivery. ED presentation and hospital utilization characteristics were explored for people with cancer and compared with those patients without cancer.

methodsThis descriptive, retrospective, multicentre cohort study used hospital administrative data. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to summarise and compare ED presentation characteristics amongst cancer and non-cancer groups. Predictive analyses were used to identify ED presentation features predictive of hospital admission for cancer patients. Outcomes of interest were level of acuity, ED and inpatient length of stay, re-presentation rates and admission rates amongst cancer patients and non-cancer patients.

resultsED (529,377) presentations occurred over the 36 months, of which 2.4% (n = 12,489) were cancer-related. Compared with all other attendances, cancer-related attendances had a higher level of acuity, requiring longer management time and length of stay in ED. Re-presentation rates for people with cancer were nearly double those of others (64 vs 33%, p < 0.001), with twice the rate of hospital admission (90 vs 46%, p < 0.001), longer inpatient length of stay (5.6 vs 2.8 days, p < 0.001) and had higher inpatient mortality (7.9 vs 1.0%, p < 0.001). Acuity and arriving by ambulance were significant predictors of hospital admission, with cancer-related attendances having ten times the odds of admission compared to other attendances (OR = 10.4, 95% CI 9.8-11.1).

conclusionsED presentations by people with cancer represent a more urgent, complex caseload frequently requiring hospital admission when compared to other presentations, suggesting that for optimal cancer care, close collaboration and integration of oncology, palliative care and emergency medicine providers are needed to improve pathways of care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVictoriaYoung AdultAdmissionCancerEmergency departmentHospitalizationMortalitySymptoms

Identifiers

PMID26306522
OpenAlexW1130697437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.